Peter Charalambous
speaker
89 appearances
2 recordings
2 series
first heard May 2025
last heard May 2025
Peter Charalambous’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
Yeah, there's certainly fewer defense exhibits than the prosecution, and that's because the burden's not on them here. But at times, they can be rather effective when it comes to these cross-examinations. Let's use one example of a piece of evidence that they used, and it relates to that 2016 incident at the Intercontinental Hotel.
There was a lot of testimony from Ventura about basically how she felt pressured into this, how she didn't really want to participate in this because she had an upcoming movie premiere, and how it particularly became a problem for her when she was bruised from that vicious attack and basically had to put on enough makeup to make sure that she went to a red carpet premiere and...
had dozens of photos taken of her. But I'll just pull up this one text message exchange that the defense attorneys brought up and asked her about, where this is a text message exchange between her and Combs. This is taken on March 5th, 2016, same date as you can see on the timestamp of that video. And you can see Ventura basically expressing a pretty strong eagerness to engage in a freak off.
Baby, I want to freak off so bad. I don't want to myself up. What am I to do? And then Combs responds, what do you want to do? And for a skeptical juror, a piece of evidence like this, where you're seeing Ventura seem eager, willing to participate in a freak off, can really cut against the prosecution's argument here that she was coerced into this.
And of course, we can't generalize the relationship here based off one particular example. This one piece of evidence doesn't cut against the prosecution argument that this is a years long relationship where she was coerced to participate in these freak offs time and time again.
But again, when we're dealing with such an important encounter, again, this 2016 incident that was caught on video is so central to the prosecution case. A piece of evidence like this can go a long way for a jury. I guess as I was thinking about this conversation, I went back to look at the transcripts, the opening statement that this jury heard from the prosecution.
It's interesting because when you look at how Prosecutor Emily Johnson phrased this case, She ended her opening statement with something that's kind of boilerplate for prosecutors, at least in the Southern District. You hear kind of this very similar ending to their opening statement where they warn the jury about what's coming next and the nature of how the evidence is going to come in.
And she says, quote, the evidence will come in piece by piece and it won't always come in in chronological order. But by the end of this trial, when you've seen and heard all of the evidence, you'll see how it all fits together. I guess the general idea here is for this jury, they're basically hearing all of this evidence in no particular order. It's not chronological.
It's not categorized for them by criminal count. It's haphazard in a way. And, you know, if you're looking at the evidence like you are, an experienced attorney, you can see how the puzzle pieces all fit together. But for a jury, they've heard from dozens of witnesses. They've heard hours of testimony. They've seen hundreds of exhibits. It's overwhelming. It's hard to piece together.
And among all those pieces, you can find plenty of reasonable doubt if you're really looking for it. Of course, the prosecution and the defense will have their closing statements where they can try to assemble that puzzle for the jurors themselves. But I guess that's just one thing to think about as we're talking about how impactful a lot of this individual evidence can be.
Yeah, that really did. I mean, at this point, Kid Cudi's gotten off the stand days ago, but his impact on the trial has really remained. And I think from the start with this entire line of inquiry about this arson investigation, this alleged firebombing, there was a bit of uncertainty about how much concrete evidence there was connecting Combs to this actual incident.
I mean, even when you read the indictment in this case, they kind of left a question mark on that in terms of What is the arson here? What are the details here? It wasn't really particularly publicly reported at the time of the actual incident that Combs had any kind of connection to it.
And in this piece of evidence, the jury's really seeing the only piece of concrete material that ties Combs to this incident. And of course, the jury has seen a ton of photos of the aftermath of this. They saw the charred roof, the charred seats. During testimony on Wednesday, they saw photos where you could see the Molotov cocktail that sitting in the driver's seat.
You can see the handkerchief that was lit on fire. And through this kind of standard DMV report, the jury has seen this and we see it in front of us here. It's directly tying Combs to this incident.
Even if we don't necessarily know if Combs was there, we don't know how he was directly connected to it, but kind of gives some more credence to this suspicion from Kid Cudi that Combs was the one who was behind it.
Speaking of that arson investigation, one thing I'm really interested in your perspective as an attorney is we heard a bit from the Los Angeles Fire Department arson investigator Lance Jimenez, who kind of described whether or not it was unusual that the fingerprints were destroyed while the investigation was ongoing. The fence objected and asked the judge for a mistrial.
Why was that a big deal and why ask for a mistrial there?
Interesting. Moving for a mistrial. Is that a particularly unusual thing to see during a trial?
You guys love asking for mistrials.
I guess what stood out to me was kind of how we're beginning to see some of this evidence go full circle here, right? Because we heard about, for example, this one incident where basically Combs rushed into her room. He found her sleeping, was frustrated because she was supposed to be packing for a music festival, and basically became violent. It became bloody very quickly.
Showing 21–40 of 89 · page 2 of 5
← Previous
Next →