Peter Diamandis

Alex, to you, buddy, what does this mean, do you think?

And we're going to have Michael Kratios on the show very shortly, right, who's overseeing a lot of the technology side of this in the Trump White House.

It'll be an interesting conversation.

You know, another thing just to mention, Alex, we'll have your view on this.

In one fashion, this pre-release vetting creates sort of a compliance moat.

that OpenAI, Google, Anthropic can afford, but the smaller labs cannot, right?

And this might create sort of a limiting of the field toward an oligopoly of AI labs.

Do you think that might be the case?

That's where we're going to end up falling behind from a geopolitical perspective.

And this is not a political podcast, so I'll pause on that.

But it is a challenge if there is veto rights versus partnership and understanding.

I mean, open source is three months behind right now, so you're basically creating parity between the closed source and open source.

I mean, what's going to happen?

We've already talked about this.

We've already said that the labs are going to hold back on their cutting edge capability because they're going to use it internally.

And in some ways, that will benefit them if the government is saying, wow, that's way too powerful for you to release.

And they'll release derivative products based on it, discoveries in physics, whatever the case might be.

Don't you think?

Hey everybody, you may not know this, but I've got an incredible research team.

Every week, myself, my research team study the meta trends that are impacting the world.