Pierre Poilievre

Right.

And you hear these things and you go, oh, you know, that's some stats and whatever, and it's, you know, not necessarily tanked the economy yet.

But as an employer of hundreds and hundreds of people all over the world now, I have started to notice that

that the case for hiring certain groups of people is becoming much more tricky now because of these tools.

And it doesn't make me sound great saying that.

It's not that we're not hiring hundreds of people, but there's this certain set.

When I look at specifically entry-level grads,

If they aren't really AI proficient, they are a lot less appealing in some roles than people, young grads that are extremely AI proficient.

And the problem is not many of them are.

And just in a company like mine, if you're AI proficient, really irrespective of age, and you know how to build this thing called AI agents, it's kind of like you come with 50 team members of your own.

Wow.

That's what it's like.

So I've got a kid called Kaz here.

You know, he's a young guy in his 20s.

He's built a team of agents that now work for him.

So hiring Kaz means I get Kaz and his team of agents because he's proficient in that technology.

Most of the workforce hasn't been trained because of the education system to know a thing about this.

So it's becoming increasingly difficult to hire entry-level people, but actually all the way up the board, unless you have deep expertise in a domain...

which would mean that I can get Kaz to make you the agents.

So like on my CFO, you know, for example, you know, 50 years working in finance, et cetera, deep expertise.