Pierre Poilievre

So Parliament's back in late January. It will take some weeks to actually get a non-confidence vote onto the floor of the House of Commons. Then we'll see if Jagmeet Singh's latest promise of voting non-confidence was as insincere as his prior commitments to that effect.

So Parliament's back in late January. It will take some weeks to actually get a non-confidence vote onto the floor of the House of Commons. Then we'll see if Jagmeet Singh's latest promise of voting non-confidence was as insincere as his prior commitments to that effect.

In February. So he's now, basically, he said yesterday that he would put forward a non-confidence motion at the earliest opportunity. Well, that's likely to be March, which is... Oh, that's convenient.

In February. So he's now, basically, he said yesterday that he would put forward a non-confidence motion at the earliest opportunity. Well, that's likely to be March, which is... Oh, that's convenient.

In February. So he's now, basically, he said yesterday that he would put forward a non-confidence motion at the earliest opportunity. Well, that's likely to be March, which is... Oh, that's convenient.

Singh will not vote non-confidence before... he gets his pension, or at least he will not vote non-confidence in a way that sees the election happen before his pension kicks in. So we won't have an election before very late winter, early spring.

Singh will not vote non-confidence before... he gets his pension, or at least he will not vote non-confidence in a way that sees the election happen before his pension kicks in. So we won't have an election before very late winter, early spring.

Singh will not vote non-confidence before... he gets his pension, or at least he will not vote non-confidence in a way that sees the election happen before his pension kicks in. So we won't have an election before very late winter, early spring.

Then there's the possibility that the Trudeau resigns and then goes to the governor general and says, we need to shut down parliament while the liberal party then chooses a new replacement. a Trudeau 2.0. And so there would be a leadership race.

Then there's the possibility that the Trudeau resigns and then goes to the governor general and says, we need to shut down parliament while the liberal party then chooses a new replacement. a Trudeau 2.0. And so there would be a leadership race.

Then there's the possibility that the Trudeau resigns and then goes to the governor general and says, we need to shut down parliament while the liberal party then chooses a new replacement. a Trudeau 2.0. And so there would be a leadership race.

Yeah, probably. And during which time we'd continue to flounder and twist, twist in the wind. And by the way, you know, the liberal media is all saying, well, surely you wouldn't want to trigger an election during the liberal leadership race. Excuse me, the Canadian people are not obliged, 41 million people are not obliged to wait around while this party sorts out its shit.

Yeah, probably. And during which time we'd continue to flounder and twist, twist in the wind. And by the way, you know, the liberal media is all saying, well, surely you wouldn't want to trigger an election during the liberal leadership race. Excuse me, the Canadian people are not obliged, 41 million people are not obliged to wait around while this party sorts out its shit.

Yeah, probably. And during which time we'd continue to flounder and twist, twist in the wind. And by the way, you know, the liberal media is all saying, well, surely you wouldn't want to trigger an election during the liberal leadership race. Excuse me, the Canadian people are not obliged, 41 million people are not obliged to wait around while this party sorts out its shit.

These guys could have got rid of Trudeau a year and a half ago. They knew he was a disaster then. And now they say, well, we're low in the polls, so we have to get rid of him. Now, you didn't care when he was just depriving single mothers of food for their kids or doubling housing costs or unleashing crime in neighborhoods across the country. But now...

These guys could have got rid of Trudeau a year and a half ago. They knew he was a disaster then. And now they say, well, we're low in the polls, so we have to get rid of him. Now, you didn't care when he was just depriving single mothers of food for their kids or doubling housing costs or unleashing crime in neighborhoods across the country. But now...

These guys could have got rid of Trudeau a year and a half ago. They knew he was a disaster then. And now they say, well, we're low in the polls, so we have to get rid of him. Now, you didn't care when he was just depriving single mothers of food for their kids or doubling housing costs or unleashing crime in neighborhoods across the country. But now...

You're really concerned about getting rid of him because your poll numbers are down. You want to keep your job. Sorry, that's not a good reason to paralyze the entire country in the face, by the way, of a major negotiation with the incoming U.S. president who enters with a massive and powerful mandate and a man who has proven that he can spot weakness from a mile away.

You're really concerned about getting rid of him because your poll numbers are down. You want to keep your job. Sorry, that's not a good reason to paralyze the entire country in the face, by the way, of a major negotiation with the incoming U.S. president who enters with a massive and powerful mandate and a man who has proven that he can spot weakness from a mile away.

You're really concerned about getting rid of him because your poll numbers are down. You want to keep your job. Sorry, that's not a good reason to paralyze the entire country in the face, by the way, of a major negotiation with the incoming U.S. president who enters with a massive and powerful mandate and a man who has proven that he can spot weakness from a mile away.