Piers Morgan
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
And then you say in that true story that Richard Gad, who's the writer, and he's the guy who plays himself in the series, if you then...
And then you say in that true story that Richard Gad, who's the writer, and he's the guy who plays himself in the series, if you then...
And then you say in that true story that Richard Gad, who's the writer, and he's the guy who plays himself in the series, if you then...
depict him being forensically stalked by this woman, who then gets convicted and put in prison, and it turns out they claim has already had a previous prison sentence, and none of that is true, then little wonder that she's now taken out a massive lawsuit against Netflix. But why would Netflix do that?
depict him being forensically stalked by this woman, who then gets convicted and put in prison, and it turns out they claim has already had a previous prison sentence, and none of that is true, then little wonder that she's now taken out a massive lawsuit against Netflix. But why would Netflix do that?
depict him being forensically stalked by this woman, who then gets convicted and put in prison, and it turns out they claim has already had a previous prison sentence, and none of that is true, then little wonder that she's now taken out a massive lawsuit against Netflix. But why would Netflix do that?
Why would you call it a true story without, A, doing the due diligence of whether actually this was true, Or be worse, you know it's true, but you don't care. And there's a little bit of that about Donald Trump, isn't there? Well, a lot of that about Donald Trump, which is I think a lot of journalists feel they can say whatever they like about him, and that's fine.
Why would you call it a true story without, A, doing the due diligence of whether actually this was true, Or be worse, you know it's true, but you don't care. And there's a little bit of that about Donald Trump, isn't there? Well, a lot of that about Donald Trump, which is I think a lot of journalists feel they can say whatever they like about him, and that's fine.
Why would you call it a true story without, A, doing the due diligence of whether actually this was true, Or be worse, you know it's true, but you don't care. And there's a little bit of that about Donald Trump, isn't there? Well, a lot of that about Donald Trump, which is I think a lot of journalists feel they can say whatever they like about him, and that's fine.
And I think what he did with the Stephanopoulos case is put a line in the sand and say, right, if you guys are going to defame me on fact, and you mentioned earlier, you try and stick to facts. You're a lawyer by background. I'm a newspaper editor by background. We know how important facts are.
And I think what he did with the Stephanopoulos case is put a line in the sand and say, right, if you guys are going to defame me on fact, and you mentioned earlier, you try and stick to facts. You're a lawyer by background. I'm a newspaper editor by background. We know how important facts are.
And I think what he did with the Stephanopoulos case is put a line in the sand and say, right, if you guys are going to defame me on fact, and you mentioned earlier, you try and stick to facts. You're a lawyer by background. I'm a newspaper editor by background. We know how important facts are.
It's not to say we've always been faultless ourselves, but it's to say we understand the importance of veracity. We don't come from the Meghan Markle, my truth school of focus.
It's not to say we've always been faultless ourselves, but it's to say we understand the importance of veracity. We don't come from the Meghan Markle, my truth school of focus.
It's not to say we've always been faultless ourselves, but it's to say we understand the importance of veracity. We don't come from the Meghan Markle, my truth school of focus.
We come from the facts are actual facts. Now, you can then, if you take a fact, you can then... Comment as you wish about it. You can interpret a fact any way you like. You can be as opinionated as you want. Right, but what you can't do is do that about something which isn't true because then you're just defaming people.
We come from the facts are actual facts. Now, you can then, if you take a fact, you can then... Comment as you wish about it. You can interpret a fact any way you like. You can be as opinionated as you want. Right, but what you can't do is do that about something which isn't true because then you're just defaming people.
We come from the facts are actual facts. Now, you can then, if you take a fact, you can then... Comment as you wish about it. You can interpret a fact any way you like. You can be as opinionated as you want. Right, but what you can't do is do that about something which isn't true because then you're just defaming people.
And A, there's no point in that because you lose trust with your viewers if you keep doing that. If they know you're saying one thing but actually it's not true and you repeat that, I think you're pretty dead in the water as a broadcaster who'd be taken seriously by anybody. But B, why do it? In AOC's case, she's done that deliberately. She's almost taunting Trump. Come and sue me.
And A, there's no point in that because you lose trust with your viewers if you keep doing that. If they know you're saying one thing but actually it's not true and you repeat that, I think you're pretty dead in the water as a broadcaster who'd be taken seriously by anybody. But B, why do it? In AOC's case, she's done that deliberately. She's almost taunting Trump. Come and sue me.