Piers Morgan

this means X, Y, Z, and the other person goes, no, no, no, it means boom, boom, boom. Try to work out actually what does it mean? People often say to me, if you go back to the start of the Israel and Palestine conflict in, say, 1948, you can go back a lot further, but say you go back to 1948, you could construct a very good argument for both sides. over the next 75 years. You could.

this means X, Y, Z, and the other person goes, no, no, no, it means boom, boom, boom. Try to work out actually what does it mean? People often say to me, if you go back to the start of the Israel and Palestine conflict in, say, 1948, you can go back a lot further, but say you go back to 1948, you could construct a very good argument for both sides. over the next 75 years. You could.

this means X, Y, Z, and the other person goes, no, no, no, it means boom, boom, boom. Try to work out actually what does it mean? People often say to me, if you go back to the start of the Israel and Palestine conflict in, say, 1948, you can go back a lot further, but say you go back to 1948, you could construct a very good argument for both sides. over the next 75 years. You could.

If you were just sitting back and just taking a set of facts and trying to present the argument for the defence of Israel or the Palestinians, you could do a powerful piece for both. And there was a Jewish journalist called Jonathan Friedland who actually said that, which I thought was interesting. And I sort of agree with that about almost all issues.

If you were just sitting back and just taking a set of facts and trying to present the argument for the defence of Israel or the Palestinians, you could do a powerful piece for both. And there was a Jewish journalist called Jonathan Friedland who actually said that, which I thought was interesting. And I sort of agree with that about almost all issues.

If you were just sitting back and just taking a set of facts and trying to present the argument for the defence of Israel or the Palestinians, you could do a powerful piece for both. And there was a Jewish journalist called Jonathan Friedland who actually said that, which I thought was interesting. And I sort of agree with that about almost all issues.

And the challenge is to really get into the weeds of these debates, analyse the facts, hear the different opinions, and then hopefully... depending on the power of the argument, the viewers at home, A, they learn a lot, which is really a perfect show for me where they're learning things, but B, they can formulate their own opinions.

And the challenge is to really get into the weeds of these debates, analyse the facts, hear the different opinions, and then hopefully... depending on the power of the argument, the viewers at home, A, they learn a lot, which is really a perfect show for me where they're learning things, but B, they can formulate their own opinions.

And the challenge is to really get into the weeds of these debates, analyse the facts, hear the different opinions, and then hopefully... depending on the power of the argument, the viewers at home, A, they learn a lot, which is really a perfect show for me where they're learning things, but B, they can formulate their own opinions.

Maybe they go one, maybe they go the other, maybe they sit somewhere in the middle. That to me is a really good debate.

Maybe they go one, maybe they go the other, maybe they sit somewhere in the middle. That to me is a really good debate.

Maybe they go one, maybe they go the other, maybe they sit somewhere in the middle. That to me is a really good debate.

I'll tell you what I think. I think that October the 7th is one of the worst things I've ever seen. I think the retribution, as I call it, by Israel has now gone way beyond what is acceptable.

I'll tell you what I think. I think that October the 7th is one of the worst things I've ever seen. I think the retribution, as I call it, by Israel has now gone way beyond what is acceptable.

I'll tell you what I think. I think that October the 7th is one of the worst things I've ever seen. I think the retribution, as I call it, by Israel has now gone way beyond what is acceptable.

I take issue with people that want to frame it as genocide purely from a technical point of view, that actually the definition of genocide would mean that if Israel had killed a million people, I could accept the argument this is a bona fide genocide.

I take issue with people that want to frame it as genocide purely from a technical point of view, that actually the definition of genocide would mean that if Israel had killed a million people, I could accept the argument this is a bona fide genocide.

I take issue with people that want to frame it as genocide purely from a technical point of view, that actually the definition of genocide would mean that if Israel had killed a million people, I could accept the argument this is a bona fide genocide.

It's more complex for me as a journalist when I look at this and compare it to other genocides and I compare it to other wars that if you take the central argument of Israel, which is put aside everything that happened before, if you take October the 7th and the scale of it with 250 people being kidnapped,

It's more complex for me as a journalist when I look at this and compare it to other genocides and I compare it to other wars that if you take the central argument of Israel, which is put aside everything that happened before, if you take October the 7th and the scale of it with 250 people being kidnapped,