Professor Alexandru Stancu

So, in particular, decisions that involve human life must always remain under human responsibility.

So this is not only a technical challenge, it is also an ethical and legal one.

So as I said, even if we increase the level of autonomy and the level of AI, the human is still in the loop because the robots helps the humans.

So the human is still there to set up the mission and the human must be able at any point to stop the mission if something goes wrong.

They should be immediately, yeah.

Okay.

I'm not aware about what Russia is doing, but I'm sure that the robots are there to help humans.

So I'm sure that the human is still in the loop.

At this moment, you cannot leave the robots to do things by themselves.

Of course, there should be their ethics and regulations.

Well, so...

There is increasing international discussion around this, although approaches can vary between countries.

What is widely accepted, however, is the principle that humans should remain in the loop.

Robots are tools.

They are designed to assist humans, especially in dangerous and complex environments, whether in military operations or industries such as nuclear or oil and gas.

The human defines the mission and is responsible for ensuring it complies with international laws.

Just as important, humans must always have the ability to intervene or stop the system if something goes wrong.

Yes, yes.

But

You know, I believe the same is applying with AI and robotics.