Puneet Kukreja

They are being developed both from the perspective of bringing in...

and advancing how humans can do more.

But AI always has been, and I've said it a couple of times now, it's a double-edged sword.

We're using it for good, but the perpetrators are also going to use it for bad.

So when we say we use it for good, what evidence is there and what technology, what control, what advancements are there for the human defenders to defend against it, but also what advancements can we get with getting more productivity out of it?

Well, I'll go back and put some confidence back into the human world.

For me, it's about, and for us, it's about navigating what we find ourselves, which is a technological pivot, but navigating it with confidence.

Because

What's not going to change is the evolution of the models.

What's not going to change is the adoption of the models because we are all looking for productivity gains.

What's not going to change is the investment.

So the control structures around it

cannot actually follow through a document, dashboard, committee-style rhythm.

It needs to follow the model of you need to think about resilient systems, you need to think about a resilient organization, and you need to imagine what would that engineered solution at speed look like.

Although not everyone profited off that at the time.

I do agree with it.

And I'll go back and talk about, we talked about glasswing and mythos.

There's a lot of conversation about it.

There's a lot of global media about it.

Governments are getting together.