Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz

to start with, before you say, to say, because then the Rashi Tevis, so the first four words that you say, are, so the question is, but wait a second, is part of another Pasuk, so, so the Archa Shulchan says, yeah, yeah, that's why people have a minute to whisper the rest of the Pasuk.

meaning they say the whole Pasuk in order to address that issue.

Chassam Sofer says, no, you can't say the whole Pasuk, because the Pasuk says, the Gemara Darshans, the Hamisa,

We'd rather not mention Misa on Shabbos.

And therefore, he says, it's considered low F-shar.

That's quite a liberal definition of low F-shar.

You could just leave out the whole thing.

But apparently, the desire to want to have the remez of the Yud Kei Vav Kei

is enough that it's called low efshar, wild.

So that's why we're allowed to do it.

Magnev Ram says that in tefillah, you're allowed to mention different parts of a pasuk.

If you say, I suspect that's what people assume when they make songs also, that it's that if a person is singing with a certain kavanah, that it's a kind of a tefillah.

I don't know, I don't know.

But, okay, in fact, in the Chuvos Rav Pa'alim, he says, that's why by Kiddush Levana we say the Pasuk, which is the middle of a Pasuk, because we're saying it, In fact, on the other hand, the Yachnu Boaz in the Mishnah is saying,

points out that who says a Pasuk means a whole Pasuk?

Maybe a Pasuk means a significant enough portion of a Pasuk that it's an independent phrase.

So maybe if there's an Asnachta, that's enough to make it an entire Pasuk.

And therefore, by Kiddush during the day, we say Alken Beirech, which is the first part of the Pasuk following the Asnachta.

So it's not considered to be...

a pasuk that was split.