Rachel Abrams
👤 SpeakerVoice Profile Active
This person's voice can be automatically recognized across podcast episodes using AI voice matching.
Appearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Well, another line of reporting that I did years after the General Motors stuff was I was involved in the paper's coverage of the Me Too movement. And one of the stories involved a woman who lost her law license because she was a source to us. But eventually she reached out to me and said, I kind of want to talk about why I leaked. And we had lunch, and I listened to her, and I eventually said—
Well, another line of reporting that I did years after the General Motors stuff was I was involved in the paper's coverage of the Me Too movement. And one of the stories involved a woman who lost her law license because she was a source to us. But eventually she reached out to me and said, I kind of want to talk about why I leaked. And we had lunch, and I listened to her, and I eventually said—
The daily is where I think your story belongs. I just feel like audio can just do something for the story. And you were right. Yeah, and it was incredible to listen to her, and that's what brought me to the show first. After that, I started guest hosting with you guys.
The daily is where I think your story belongs. I just feel like audio can just do something for the story. And you were right. Yeah, and it was incredible to listen to her, and that's what brought me to the show first. After that, I started guest hosting with you guys.
Yeah, yeah, I'll do it. I'll do it.
Yeah, yeah, I'll do it. I'll do it.
We're going to go around the world. Yeah, we're going to go around the world. Yeah, we're going to see who's best. Go for it. Michael, Natalie, thank you both so much.
We're going to go around the world. Yeah, we're going to go around the world. Yeah, we're going to see who's best. Go for it. Michael, Natalie, thank you both so much.
From The New York Times, I'm Rachel Abrams, and this is The Daily. In a blow that has threatened to derail President Trump's trade agenda, a federal court ruled on Wednesday that many of the president's tariffs are in fact illegal. That decision makes the future of Trump's trade war even more uncertain. Today,
From The New York Times, I'm Rachel Abrams, and this is The Daily. In a blow that has threatened to derail President Trump's trade agenda, a federal court ruled on Wednesday that many of the president's tariffs are in fact illegal. That decision makes the future of Trump's trade war even more uncertain. Today,
Hi, it's Rachel Abrams from The Daily. How are you?
Hi, it's Rachel Abrams from The Daily. How are you?
You're having quite the day.
You're having quite the day.
Obviously, the reason that you're getting hounded is that you were the lead plaintiff on a case that got ruled on Wednesday afternoon.
Obviously, the reason that you're getting hounded is that you were the lead plaintiff on a case that got ruled on Wednesday afternoon.