Rachel White

So according to investigators out of Gilbert, Arizona, someone parked a Jeep Wrangler outside of Brandon's home and fired a shot at him back in October 2019. Brandon wasn't hurt, but the bullet shattered the driver's side window of his car. Investigators believe that Lori's brother, Alex Cox, was the shooter, but he was never charged because he died before charges were even filed.

So according to investigators out of Gilbert, Arizona, someone parked a Jeep Wrangler outside of Brandon's home and fired a shot at him back in October 2019. Brandon wasn't hurt, but the bullet shattered the driver's side window of his car. Investigators believe that Lori's brother, Alex Cox, was the shooter, but he was never charged because he died before charges were even filed.

So according to investigators out of Gilbert, Arizona, someone parked a Jeep Wrangler outside of Brandon's home and fired a shot at him back in October 2019. Brandon wasn't hurt, but the bullet shattered the driver's side window of his car. Investigators believe that Lori's brother, Alex Cox, was the shooter, but he was never charged because he died before charges were even filed.

Investigators did, however, charge Lori, who has pleaded not guilty...

Investigators did, however, charge Lori, who has pleaded not guilty...

Investigators did, however, charge Lori, who has pleaded not guilty...

And Andrea, this back and forth went on for a few more minutes. The judge said that he had ruled on Lori's motions as required by law and refused to recuse himself.

And Andrea, this back and forth went on for a few more minutes. The judge said that he had ruled on Lori's motions as required by law and refused to recuse himself.

And Andrea, this back and forth went on for a few more minutes. The judge said that he had ruled on Lori's motions as required by law and refused to recuse himself.

Opening statements are scheduled for June 2nd, and the trial is expected to last until June 13th.

Opening statements are scheduled for June 2nd, and the trial is expected to last until June 13th.

Opening statements are scheduled for June 2nd, and the trial is expected to last until June 13th.

The Menendez brothers were set to go before the parole board at a hearing on June 13th. That's the next big step in their quest for freedom. But this week, a spokesperson for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation said the brothers' parole hearing has been delayed to August 21st and August 22nd.

The Menendez brothers were set to go before the parole board at a hearing on June 13th. That's the next big step in their quest for freedom. But this week, a spokesperson for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation said the brothers' parole hearing has been delayed to August 21st and August 22nd.

The Menendez brothers were set to go before the parole board at a hearing on June 13th. That's the next big step in their quest for freedom. But this week, a spokesperson for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation said the brothers' parole hearing has been delayed to August 21st and August 22nd.

The June 13th hearing wasn't initially supposed to be a parole hearing. It was a separate hearing for their efforts seeking clemency from California Governor Gavin Newsom. But when the brothers were resentenced last week, the parole board asked to convert that clemency hearing into a parole hearing.

The June 13th hearing wasn't initially supposed to be a parole hearing. It was a separate hearing for their efforts seeking clemency from California Governor Gavin Newsom. But when the brothers were resentenced last week, the parole board asked to convert that clemency hearing into a parole hearing.

The June 13th hearing wasn't initially supposed to be a parole hearing. It was a separate hearing for their efforts seeking clemency from California Governor Gavin Newsom. But when the brothers were resentenced last week, the parole board asked to convert that clemency hearing into a parole hearing.

But when the parole board informed key parties involved in the case, including victims' families, of the June date, some parties raised objections. So the parole hearing got moved to August. Any idea what those objections were?

But when the parole board informed key parties involved in the case, including victims' families, of the June date, some parties raised objections. So the parole hearing got moved to August. Any idea what those objections were?