Reid Hoffman

And if you don't, like, go with it, like take the Industrial Revolution, which also had a bunch of things, why did Europe – basically set the drumbeat for the globe for centuries? The answer is Europe embraced the Industrial Revolution robustly and early. It's part of what made the British Empire. And so that clock is set by Europe. different human beings all running at it.

And if you don't, like, go with it, like take the Industrial Revolution, which also had a bunch of things, why did Europe – basically set the drumbeat for the globe for centuries? The answer is Europe embraced the Industrial Revolution robustly and early. It's part of what made the British Empire. And so that clock is set by Europe. different human beings all running at it.

And by the way, they have different theories of the good. They have different theories of how technology should be in society. They have different theories of what the risks are, technologies. Like, you know, when these people published this pause letter, that was like, that's a mistake. Like, other people aren't going to pause. Look, it's a simple thing you look at.

And by the way, they have different theories of the good. They have different theories of how technology should be in society. They have different theories of what the risks are, technologies. Like, you know, when these people published this pause letter, that was like, that's a mistake. Like, other people aren't going to pause. Look, it's a simple thing you look at.

The people who care about humanity, if they all pause, and the people who don't care about humanity don't pause, Your letter, if you achieve your success, will cause a bad impact on humanity. So you have to be developing it. You have to be going with the clock that's set by the world, right?

The people who care about humanity, if they all pause, and the people who don't care about humanity don't pause, Your letter, if you achieve your success, will cause a bad impact on humanity. So you have to be developing it. You have to be going with the clock that's set by the world, right?

Oh, that's a good question.

Oh, that's a good question.

Well, it depends. Part of the thing is we human beings are very bad at imagining future technology. So I can tell you stories about where we have created AIs with IQ of 1,000. I can tell you stories where we've created AIs with IQs of 200, of 150. And I can also tell you stories of AIs where we've created that are kind of the equivalent, because today we have this, as a form of like idiot savants.

Well, it depends. Part of the thing is we human beings are very bad at imagining future technology. So I can tell you stories about where we have created AIs with IQ of 1,000. I can tell you stories where we've created AIs with IQs of 200, of 150. And I can also tell you stories of AIs where we've created that are kind of the equivalent, because today we have this, as a form of like idiot savants.

Like today's AIs are super intelligent. I'll give you an example. So if I go to a human being, I try to look around at a human being and say, explain to me a mixture of experts, creation of AI within AI. What does that mean? It's a technique by which modern AIs are created that have different kind of expertise roles in the combination. Like ChatGPT is created this way that create their output.

Like today's AIs are super intelligent. I'll give you an example. So if I go to a human being, I try to look around at a human being and say, explain to me a mixture of experts, creation of AI within AI. What does that mean? It's a technique by which modern AIs are created that have different kind of expertise roles in the combination. Like ChatGPT is created this way that create their output.

It's a particular technical definition for the way of creating a world-class AI model. Then I say, okay, compare a mixture of experts. So use only thousands of people who understand how to do that. And I say, okay, compare that to modern economic game theory. Well, there's probably some humans that can do that too. We're probably now down to like 50 to 100.

It's a particular technical definition for the way of creating a world-class AI model. Then I say, okay, compare a mixture of experts. So use only thousands of people who understand how to do that. And I say, okay, compare that to modern economic game theory. Well, there's probably some humans that can do that too. We're probably now down to like 50 to 100.

Then I say, okay, compare those two to modern oceanography, right? Okay, now we're at zero human beings. There's no human beings going to do this, but I can go to GBD-4 and I can run this. GBD-4, because it's ingested a trillion words of knowledge, can write the comparisons between these three things. Because it knows all three. Because it knows all three.

Then I say, okay, compare those two to modern oceanography, right? Okay, now we're at zero human beings. There's no human beings going to do this, but I can go to GBD-4 and I can run this. GBD-4, because it's ingested a trillion words of knowledge, can write the comparisons between these three things. Because it knows all three. Because it knows all three.

That's a superpower that no human being has. We have AI superpower today. But of course, no one's alarmed about that because they're like, oh, that's a great amplification intelligence. That really helps me.

That's a superpower that no human being has. We have AI superpower today. But of course, no one's alarmed about that because they're like, oh, that's a great amplification intelligence. That really helps me.

I think there's a very good chance that what happens is that what we're creating with all of every current AI technique that's under development is these amazing savants that are these great co-pilots. And that's what we're creating. Not Terminator robots, not super intelligences. There's a possibility of that.

I think there's a very good chance that what happens is that what we're creating with all of every current AI technique that's under development is these amazing savants that are these great co-pilots. And that's what we're creating. Not Terminator robots, not super intelligences. There's a possibility of that.