Rick Artestrine

The report was extraordinary.

If you want me, I can, you know, I've got the report excerpts of the report itself.

And if you'd like, I can touch base on it.

It's a little lengthy, but I think your listeners would probably find it interesting, especially those who are radiochemists or someone with a scientific background.

They might find this analysis interesting in and of itself.

Now, I can't vouch for what he's saying here to be accurate because I'm not qualified to.

He was a very credible guy, very serious about his work, very objective.

Very critical, but this is what he wrote.

I received a large piece of window screen and on the screen were four discolored spots.

He said four.

The marks consisted of three large circular spots and one smaller irregularly shaped spot.

I took eight one inch by one inch samples of the screen.

The first four samples were of the spots in question.

The samples all included a part of the border of the affected and unaffected area.

The other four samples were randomly spaced cuttings across the rest of the screen.

I tested all eight screen samples for carbon residue using a gentle swipe technique.

No carbon residue was present.

I then tested for any loose particulate using a very mild solvent rinse.

Aside from a bit of normal particulate ,

That would be expected on any type of window screen there was, and there was no other loose particulate on the screen itself.