Rick Dhaliwal

You're going to have your picks that don't pan out, but if you don't make many of them, those become even more damaging, and I feel like they're putting that now on this draft.

They're like, we have to nail this one because next year we're getting back to training away first.

No, just kidding.

I actually wanted to ask you about this.

Is it awkward that the Canucks are going to employ all these scouts that are going to, you know, advise on this very important draft upcoming and a lot of them may not be back?

Is he going to be able to hire them in time for the draft?

It's next month.

Real quick here, Rick, because we've got to go.

If you had to guess right now, who are the Canucks drafting at three?

Well, what if Stenberg is there at three?

I know, but he's a talented winger.

I think it would be insane to draft for position where the Canucks are right now.

And I am... Like, Halford gets tired of hearing me talk about the importance of centermen and having a number one defenseman.

He's been hearing this forever.

But for the Canucks to draft based on position with what they've got right now in their prospect system would be the highest level of insanity.

If Stenberg is there...

and they think he is the best player and that he is the most talented and the most likely to turn into a star player in the NHL, they need to take him.

Yeah, but I'm assuming that McKenna's off the board.

That's the dumbest argument I've ever heard.

I'm sorry.