Ro Khanna

We're not as concerned about having the full release.

as long as they're complying with the spirit of the law, at least they're going to release something.

But then we saw the documents filled with blanket redactions, documents that judges had ordered to be released, they had blanked out.

There's no draft indictment there that actually has the names of other men who may be implicated in the abuse.

There's not the prosecution's original memo that we wanted to see released.

There are none of the files on Epstein's computer.

And we do not know, then, who these other rich and powerful men were who abused these survivors.

And we know from the survivors and the survivors' lawyers that that information is in the files.

So this is deeply disappointing.

They have not complied with the law, and we're gonna continue to fight to make sure they do.

Folks, this is a criminal cartel in the White House.

People are taking a big risk by not enforcing the law.

We also, of course, could have impeachment hearings against either the Pambandi or the deputy attorney general.

We could hold them in inherent contempt of Congress.

But I don't want to go there just on one day.

I mean, what I would prefer is that we get an explanation for where the other documents are and what their timeline is.

So far, based on what we've seen, there are just excessive redactions.

I mean, there's one document from the New York grand jury, which a federal judge ordered released, totally redacted, 119 pages all redacted.

And there are not the types of documents so far that we were looking for.

Now, we haven't done the whole review.