Rob Bonta

Supreme Court and the circuit courts and other appellate courts and also can argue. with great persuasion and skill. So we're confident in our advocate. We're confident in our case. The case is about the issue of a related and critical issue in the case, but not the actual substance of the constitutional right of birthright citizenship. It's about national injunctions and whether

Supreme Court and the circuit courts and other appellate courts and also can argue. with great persuasion and skill. So we're confident in our advocate. We're confident in our case. The case is about the issue of a related and critical issue in the case, but not the actual substance of the constitutional right of birthright citizenship. It's about national injunctions and whether

Supreme Court and the circuit courts and other appellate courts and also can argue. with great persuasion and skill. So we're confident in our advocate. We're confident in our case. The case is about the issue of a related and critical issue in the case, but not the actual substance of the constitutional right of birthright citizenship. It's about national injunctions and whether

group of states who go to a court can get a an order from the court and injunction that applies throughout the whole nation as opposed to in their in their states and This is a great case for us to be in front of the US Supreme Court on because this is about a US constitutional right and constitutional rights belong to all In the United States, they either apply to all of us or they apply to none of us.

group of states who go to a court can get a an order from the court and injunction that applies throughout the whole nation as opposed to in their in their states and This is a great case for us to be in front of the US Supreme Court on because this is about a US constitutional right and constitutional rights belong to all In the United States, they either apply to all of us or they apply to none of us.

group of states who go to a court can get a an order from the court and injunction that applies throughout the whole nation as opposed to in their in their states and This is a great case for us to be in front of the US Supreme Court on because this is about a US constitutional right and constitutional rights belong to all In the United States, they either apply to all of us or they apply to none of us.

They don't apply to to the people in blue states, but not the people in red states. So we think a national injunction is very appropriate in this case. And we're looking forward to the argument and being able to make a compelling and persuasive case to the US Supreme Court.

They don't apply to to the people in blue states, but not the people in red states. So we think a national injunction is very appropriate in this case. And we're looking forward to the argument and being able to make a compelling and persuasive case to the US Supreme Court.

They don't apply to to the people in blue states, but not the people in red states. So we think a national injunction is very appropriate in this case. And we're looking forward to the argument and being able to make a compelling and persuasive case to the US Supreme Court.

I'm honored and hopefully not the last. I'm grateful to have the opportunity to join you and talk to your amazing followers and audience.

I'm honored and hopefully not the last. I'm grateful to have the opportunity to join you and talk to your amazing followers and audience.

I'm honored and hopefully not the last. I'm grateful to have the opportunity to join you and talk to your amazing followers and audience.

And one thing I do want to say to your point about the Republican attorneys general, they haven't filed one lawsuit given all of these unlawful actions that hurt their people, that hurt their constituents, that strip away their constitutional rights and other federal rights, that pull away millions and billions of dollars of already congressionally appropriated funding to their states.

And one thing I do want to say to your point about the Republican attorneys general, they haven't filed one lawsuit given all of these unlawful actions that hurt their people, that hurt their constituents, that strip away their constitutional rights and other federal rights, that pull away millions and billions of dollars of already congressionally appropriated funding to their states.

And one thing I do want to say to your point about the Republican attorneys general, they haven't filed one lawsuit given all of these unlawful actions that hurt their people, that hurt their constituents, that strip away their constitutional rights and other federal rights, that pull away millions and billions of dollars of already congressionally appropriated funding to their states.

They're sitting on their hands and saying, this is fine, letting it happen. Meanwhile, Speaker Johnson and the Republicans in Congress are doing the same thing, letting the president run roughshod over their co-equal branch of government while they're asleep at the wheel.

They're sitting on their hands and saying, this is fine, letting it happen. Meanwhile, Speaker Johnson and the Republicans in Congress are doing the same thing, letting the president run roughshod over their co-equal branch of government while they're asleep at the wheel.

They're sitting on their hands and saying, this is fine, letting it happen. Meanwhile, Speaker Johnson and the Republicans in Congress are doing the same thing, letting the president run roughshod over their co-equal branch of government while they're asleep at the wheel.

And we need people with backbone and spine who stand up for the rule of law and for rights and freedoms of Americans and to uphold the Constitution. And we are not getting that, nor do we expect that from Republican AGs or the Republican Congress. But Democratic AGs are in the House. And we believe we're the first and last line of defense when it comes to these unlawful attacks on Americans.

And we need people with backbone and spine who stand up for the rule of law and for rights and freedoms of Americans and to uphold the Constitution. And we are not getting that, nor do we expect that from Republican AGs or the Republican Congress. But Democratic AGs are in the House. And we believe we're the first and last line of defense when it comes to these unlawful attacks on Americans.