Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

And we,

And we,

There's a bad Supreme Court case recently that equated pharmaceutical advertising with freedom of speech and gave it endowed with a limited First Amendment protection. There's still things that we can do, and we're working on that. So we think that we're going to be able to do something, but I'm not going to talk more about that. Okay.

There's a bad Supreme Court case recently that equated pharmaceutical advertising with freedom of speech and gave it endowed with a limited First Amendment protection. There's still things that we can do, and we're working on that. So we think that we're going to be able to do something, but I'm not going to talk more about that. Okay.

There's a bad Supreme Court case recently that equated pharmaceutical advertising with freedom of speech and gave it endowed with a limited First Amendment protection. There's still things that we can do, and we're working on that. So we think that we're going to be able to do something, but I'm not going to talk more about that. Okay.

And the issue here that people understand, because a lot of the people who support us are for freedom of speech. Yes. Absolutely. But this is a very different issue because, first of all, the pharmaceutical companies are advertising products that are being paid for by the taxpayer.

And the issue here that people understand, because a lot of the people who support us are for freedom of speech. Yes. Absolutely. But this is a very different issue because, first of all, the pharmaceutical companies are advertising products that are being paid for by the taxpayer.

And the issue here that people understand, because a lot of the people who support us are for freedom of speech. Yes. Absolutely. But this is a very different issue because, first of all, the pharmaceutical companies are advertising products that are being paid for by the taxpayer.

and they advertise all these drugs on television, the person who's going to get the bill for that drug is my agency, and the taxpayers are going to end up paying for it. If you're selling cereal or Coke or something that might not be so good for you, At least, you know, the consumer's paying for that themselves, except if they're getting it from the SNAP program.

and they advertise all these drugs on television, the person who's going to get the bill for that drug is my agency, and the taxpayers are going to end up paying for it. If you're selling cereal or Coke or something that might not be so good for you, At least, you know, the consumer's paying for that themselves, except if they're getting it from the SNAP program.

and they advertise all these drugs on television, the person who's going to get the bill for that drug is my agency, and the taxpayers are going to end up paying for it. If you're selling cereal or Coke or something that might not be so good for you, At least, you know, the consumer's paying for that themselves, except if they're getting it from the SNAP program.

Yeah, I heard 25 states now have legislation to get sodas off of SNAP, and some of them are looking at candy and, you know, other stuff.

Yeah, I heard 25 states now have legislation to get sodas off of SNAP, and some of them are looking at candy and, you know, other stuff.

Yeah, I heard 25 states now have legislation to get sodas off of SNAP, and some of them are looking at candy and, you know, other stuff.

Yeah, so it's a huge revenue for these companies. And, you know, listen, if you want to buy a Coke, you should be able to do it. You're in America. You can do what you want. The taxpayers should not be paying for this nutrition program. And when 10% of the money is going for something that has no nutrients in it, it's not a good outcome.

Yeah, so it's a huge revenue for these companies. And, you know, listen, if you want to buy a Coke, you should be able to do it. You're in America. You can do what you want. The taxpayers should not be paying for this nutrition program. And when 10% of the money is going for something that has no nutrients in it, it's not a good outcome.

Yeah, so it's a huge revenue for these companies. And, you know, listen, if you want to buy a Coke, you should be able to do it. You're in America. You can do what you want. The taxpayers should not be paying for this nutrition program. And when 10% of the money is going for something that has no nutrients in it, it's not a good outcome.

The other thing about pharmaceutical ads is the company gets a tax deduction on them. We're paying for the ads and we're paying for the product.

The other thing about pharmaceutical ads is the company gets a tax deduction on them. We're paying for the ads and we're paying for the product.

The other thing about pharmaceutical ads is the company gets a tax deduction on them. We're paying for the ads and we're paying for the product.