Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

to sue you unless you come up with a plan right now to show how you're going to start publishing real science and stop retracting the real science and publishing the fake pharmaceutical science by these phony industry mercenaries, scientists that we call biostitutes.

to sue you unless you come up with a plan right now to show how you're going to start publishing real science and stop retracting the real science and publishing the fake pharmaceutical science by these phony industry mercenaries, scientists that we call biostitutes.

That's what they published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the Lancet, you know, eBioPharma, all of these other publications elsewhere. And I'm going to straighten that out so that people can actually get real information. The other thing that that's going to do, Mark, is it will give the attorneys a chance to litigate these issues in court because there's no good science on these issues.

That's what they published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the Lancet, you know, eBioPharma, all of these other publications elsewhere. And I'm going to straighten that out so that people can actually get real information. The other thing that that's going to do, Mark, is it will give the attorneys a chance to litigate these issues in court because there's no good science on these issues.

That's what they published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the Lancet, you know, eBioPharma, all of these other publications elsewhere. And I'm going to straighten that out so that people can actually get real information. The other thing that that's going to do, Mark, is it will give the attorneys a chance to litigate these issues in court because there's no good science on these issues.

You can't sue anybody. a company for making your children fat, for poisoning them so that their microbiome doesn't work anymore. Once you create that science, once you have 15 or 20 studies that show that, then those kind of suits become possible. And that's how you really change policy, just like we did with the Monsanto case.

You can't sue anybody. a company for making your children fat, for poisoning them so that their microbiome doesn't work anymore. Once you create that science, once you have 15 or 20 studies that show that, then those kind of suits become possible. And that's how you really change policy, just like we did with the Monsanto case.

You can't sue anybody. a company for making your children fat, for poisoning them so that their microbiome doesn't work anymore. Once you create that science, once you have 15 or 20 studies that show that, then those kind of suits become possible. And that's how you really change policy, just like we did with the Monsanto case.

We got a critical threshold of studies, animal studies, observational studies, epidemiological studies, band studies, that showed that glyphosate was causing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in Roundup. And before that, if you were the president of the United States and you tried to ban Roundup, you would go nowhere. It doesn't matter who you are. But if you have enough science...

We got a critical threshold of studies, animal studies, observational studies, epidemiological studies, band studies, that showed that glyphosate was causing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in Roundup. And before that, if you were the president of the United States and you tried to ban Roundup, you would go nowhere. It doesn't matter who you are. But if you have enough science...

We got a critical threshold of studies, animal studies, observational studies, epidemiological studies, band studies, that showed that glyphosate was causing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in Roundup. And before that, if you were the president of the United States and you tried to ban Roundup, you would go nowhere. It doesn't matter who you are. But if you have enough science...

to get past the Daubert threshold, which is that threshold in federal courts where the judge has to make an independent judgment at their sufficient science, critical mass of science, 15, 20, 25 studies out there that show the link between this exposure and this illness. That's called Daubert. And the judge is not allowed to send it to a jury until you have that package of science.

to get past the Daubert threshold, which is that threshold in federal courts where the judge has to make an independent judgment at their sufficient science, critical mass of science, 15, 20, 25 studies out there that show the link between this exposure and this illness. That's called Daubert. And the judge is not allowed to send it to a jury until you have that package of science.

to get past the Daubert threshold, which is that threshold in federal courts where the judge has to make an independent judgment at their sufficient science, critical mass of science, 15, 20, 25 studies out there that show the link between this exposure and this illness. That's called Daubert. And the judge is not allowed to send it to a jury until you have that package of science.

And what I'm going to do, I'm going to provide that enough science, sufficient science on each one of these exposures and each one of these injuries to show who's causing what and hold them responsible and quick.

And what I'm going to do, I'm going to provide that enough science, sufficient science on each one of these exposures and each one of these injuries to show who's causing what and hold them responsible and quick.

And what I'm going to do, I'm going to provide that enough science, sufficient science on each one of these exposures and each one of these injuries to show who's causing what and hold them responsible and quick.

Well, I mean, I think there's a number of ways to deal with it. One is what I said before is to make sure they're producing good science and then you have a market response. You know, once you get good information to the public, you can have a market response to bad food, to bad, you know, to tell people. You're not helping to tell mothers. You're not helping your mother, your children.

Well, I mean, I think there's a number of ways to deal with it. One is what I said before is to make sure they're producing good science and then you have a market response. You know, once you get good information to the public, you can have a market response to bad food, to bad, you know, to tell people. You're not helping to tell mothers. You're not helping your mother, your children.

Well, I mean, I think there's a number of ways to deal with it. One is what I said before is to make sure they're producing good science and then you have a market response. You know, once you get good information to the public, you can have a market response to bad food, to bad, you know, to tell people. You're not helping to tell mothers. You're not helping your mother, your children.