Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

associate professor at ucla medical school you want to do a publication an easy publication would do get a hold of the kaiser permanente medical records a depersonalized version so you can't tell who the people are and then look at the vaccine records and look at associations with subsequent diagnoses for autism or add or or peanut allergies

If you try to do a study, propose a study, like an NIH is going to find out they fund everything. And it's likely that the dean of your medical school will get a call from You walk in class or, you know, one of Tony Fauci's other operatives saying, you know, don't let this don't let this clown do this study or.

If you try to do a study, propose a study, like an NIH is going to find out they fund everything. And it's likely that the dean of your medical school will get a call from You walk in class or, you know, one of Tony Fauci's other operatives saying, you know, don't let this don't let this clown do this study or.

If you try to do a study, propose a study, like an NIH is going to find out they fund everything. And it's likely that the dean of your medical school will get a call from You walk in class or, you know, one of Tony Fauci's other operatives saying, you know, don't let this don't let this clown do this study or.

It's going to put 50 or 60 or 100 million dollars in annual funding from NIH to your medical school in jeopardy. Oh, you know, between Hammond Gates and welcome tries, Jeremy Farrar, who is up to his neck in Wuhan. They provide 64% of the biomedical research on the planet. If you are a young researcher, a scientist, a professor at a medical school,

It's going to put 50 or 60 or 100 million dollars in annual funding from NIH to your medical school in jeopardy. Oh, you know, between Hammond Gates and welcome tries, Jeremy Farrar, who is up to his neck in Wuhan. They provide 64% of the biomedical research on the planet. If you are a young researcher, a scientist, a professor at a medical school,

It's going to put 50 or 60 or 100 million dollars in annual funding from NIH to your medical school in jeopardy. Oh, you know, between Hammond Gates and welcome tries, Jeremy Farrar, who is up to his neck in Wuhan. They provide 64% of the biomedical research on the planet. If you are a young researcher, a scientist, a professor at a medical school,

They have the capacity not only to make your career, but also to ruin it. And that's the way that they control not only the scientific studies that get done, but also the outcome of all those studies across the planet. And, you know, what Fauci has done, what he's supposed to do, that kind of studies.

They have the capacity not only to make your career, but also to ruin it. And that's the way that they control not only the scientific studies that get done, but also the outcome of all those studies across the planet. And, you know, what Fauci has done, what he's supposed to do, that kind of studies.

They have the capacity not only to make your career, but also to ruin it. And that's the way that they control not only the scientific studies that get done, but also the outcome of all those studies across the planet. And, you know, what Fauci has done, what he's supposed to do, that kind of studies.

Instead, what he does is he spends the bulk of his budget developing medications, which they then farm out to the university to do phase one, phase two, and phase three trials. And the university could make $100 million on one of those trials. Plus, it gets royalty rights to the drug they're developing. So NIAID takes royalty rights. The university takes royalty rights.

Instead, what he does is he spends the bulk of his budget developing medications, which they then farm out to the university to do phase one, phase two, and phase three trials. And the university could make $100 million on one of those trials. Plus, it gets royalty rights to the drug they're developing. So NIAID takes royalty rights. The university takes royalty rights.

Instead, what he does is he spends the bulk of his budget developing medications, which they then farm out to the university to do phase one, phase two, and phase three trials. And the university could make $100 million on one of those trials. Plus, it gets royalty rights to the drug they're developing. So NIAID takes royalty rights. The university takes royalty rights.

The principal investigator who is the professor at the university who's running the clinical trial, recruiting the volunteers, he may get $15,000 a volunteer in grant money and then he gets royalty rights. And then the pharmaceutical industry comes in for the phase three And they then own the bulk of the patent, but they're sharing royalty rights with all these other players.

The principal investigator who is the professor at the university who's running the clinical trial, recruiting the volunteers, he may get $15,000 a volunteer in grant money and then he gets royalty rights. And then the pharmaceutical industry comes in for the phase three And they then own the bulk of the patent, but they're sharing royalty rights with all these other players.

The principal investigator who is the professor at the university who's running the clinical trial, recruiting the volunteers, he may get $15,000 a volunteer in grant money and then he gets royalty rights. And then the pharmaceutical industry comes in for the phase three And they then own the bulk of the patent, but they're sharing royalty rights with all these other players.

So everybody is now corrupted. Everybody is making money on this drug. And the people who are supposed to be telling us, does the drug actually benefit people? Or is it just making money for pharma? Those people don't exist.

So everybody is now corrupted. Everybody is making money on this drug. And the people who are supposed to be telling us, does the drug actually benefit people? Or is it just making money for pharma? Those people don't exist.

So everybody is now corrupted. Everybody is making money on this drug. And the people who are supposed to be telling us, does the drug actually benefit people? Or is it just making money for pharma? Those people don't exist.

Yeah, because if you look at how these drugs get approved and recommended, they're not actually being approved by people who work at FDA, by FDA employees. There are committees. One of them is called the VRBAC Committee inside of FDA, and then the ACIP Committee and CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. And the FDA committee approves the drug, and then the CDC committee recommends it.