Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
π€ SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
It does not reduce it at all as far as the science is concerned.
It does not reduce it at all as far as the science is concerned.
It does not reduce it at all as far as the science is concerned.
Yeah, I mean, you may be right about that. I'd have to go back and look at the data.
Yeah, I mean, you may be right about that. I'd have to go back and look at the data.
Yeah, I mean, you may be right about that. I'd have to go back and look at the data.
but right now i mean we're not dealing with the new variant it doesn't work against transmission it doesn't work against delta and we know i know it doesn't work against delta because the philippine studies that show that you have an equal viral road and tony fauci has admitted that so i don't know and i can't say and i think we're going to find out over time hopefully whether it actually does function in the way you know that we hope it does to prevent on vaccine injury and death
but right now i mean we're not dealing with the new variant it doesn't work against transmission it doesn't work against delta and we know i know it doesn't work against delta because the philippine studies that show that you have an equal viral road and tony fauci has admitted that so i don't know and i can't say and i think we're going to find out over time hopefully whether it actually does function in the way you know that we hope it does to prevent on vaccine injury and death
but right now i mean we're not dealing with the new variant it doesn't work against transmission it doesn't work against delta and we know i know it doesn't work against delta because the philippine studies that show that you have an equal viral road and tony fauci has admitted that so i don't know and i can't say and i think we're going to find out over time hopefully whether it actually does function in the way you know that we hope it does to prevent on vaccine injury and death
I'll say, explain to your listeners, People wonder why did we need to suppress ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine? These are well-established drugs with well-established safety profiles that have got billions of doses have been given. Ivermectin is a human drug. It also works on horses, but it won the Nobel Prize because it works so well on human beings. Tony Fauci's problem is this.
I'll say, explain to your listeners, People wonder why did we need to suppress ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine? These are well-established drugs with well-established safety profiles that have got billions of doses have been given. Ivermectin is a human drug. It also works on horses, but it won the Nobel Prize because it works so well on human beings. Tony Fauci's problem is this.
I'll say, explain to your listeners, People wonder why did we need to suppress ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine? These are well-established drugs with well-established safety profiles that have got billions of doses have been given. Ivermectin is a human drug. It also works on horses, but it won the Nobel Prize because it works so well on human beings. Tony Fauci's problem is this.
There's a little-known federal law that says you cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease.
There's a little-known federal law that says you cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease.
There's a little-known federal law that says you cannot give an emergency use authorization to a vaccine if there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease.
So if Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin are effective against COVID, it would have been illegal for them to give the emergency use authorizations to the vaccines. And they could never have gotten them approved. And it would have been a $200 billion enterprise that would have collapsed.
So if Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin are effective against COVID, it would have been illegal for them to give the emergency use authorizations to the vaccines. And they could never have gotten them approved. And it would have been a $200 billion enterprise that would have collapsed.
So if Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin are effective against COVID, it would have been illegal for them to give the emergency use authorizations to the vaccines. And they could never have gotten them approved. And it would have been a $200 billion enterprise that would have collapsed.
Well, the medical community, a lot of it was saying that. I who signed a petition. And there are so many peer-reviewed publications now that consistently say that, but he had to aggressively crusade against it to kind of drown out those reports by saying it's a horse medication. People are taking it and it's dangerous and it's overdosing people.
Well, the medical community, a lot of it was saying that. I who signed a petition. And there are so many peer-reviewed publications now that consistently say that, but he had to aggressively crusade against it to kind of drown out those reports by saying it's a horse medication. People are taking it and it's dangerous and it's overdosing people.