Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

And the doctors then start prescribing the drug and they think, oh, well, it's legitimate because it was in the New England Journal of Medicine.

But it is not.

You can't believe what's in those journals because it's all propaganda for pharma.

No, I mean what we're doing is open source journals.

We're going to have our own journals that people can open source and publish, but you'll have the peer review published with it.

So before you publish, you give that publication to a panel of experts who then read it themselves and criticize it.

And the peer review now is secret.

And then there is no raw data published, so nobody can go in and replicate it.

So to the extent possible, sometimes you can't.

You have to buy the raw data, and it's very expensive or inaccessible, so you can't publish it.

But you can publish the peer review, which is what we're doing.

And so everybody will be able to say if they have 10 peer reviewers and they all say this article sucks, it's got all these holes in it, then the public will be able to read that and doctors will be able to read it and the regulators will be able to read it.

And so it's basically open source.

It's, you know, it's crowdsourcing essentially.

And, you know, that's how you get credibility in science.

Science doesn't come from consensus.

It comes from debate.

And, you know, that's why you remember when they were telling us during COVID, oh, trust the experts.

That's not a thing in science.

Trusting the experts is the opposite of science.