Roman Yampolsky

You can improve the rate at which you are learning. You can become more efficient meta-optimizer.

So if you have fixed code, for example, you can verify that code, static verification at the time. But if it will continue modifying it, you have a much harder time guaranteeing that important properties of that system have not been modified, then the code changed.

So if you have fixed code, for example, you can verify that code, static verification at the time. But if it will continue modifying it, you have a much harder time guaranteeing that important properties of that system have not been modified, then the code changed.

So if you have fixed code, for example, you can verify that code, static verification at the time. But if it will continue modifying it, you have a much harder time guaranteeing that important properties of that system have not been modified, then the code changed.

It can always cheat. It can store parts of its code outside in the environment. It can have kind of extended mind situation. So this is exactly the type of problems I'm trying to bring up.

It can always cheat. It can store parts of its code outside in the environment. It can have kind of extended mind situation. So this is exactly the type of problems I'm trying to bring up.

It can always cheat. It can store parts of its code outside in the environment. It can have kind of extended mind situation. So this is exactly the type of problems I'm trying to bring up.

So I like Oracle types where you kind of just know that it's right. Turing likes Oracle machines. They know the right answer. How? Who knows? But they pull it out from somewhere, so you have to trust them. And that's a concern I have about humans in a world with very smart machines. We experiment with them.

So I like Oracle types where you kind of just know that it's right. Turing likes Oracle machines. They know the right answer. How? Who knows? But they pull it out from somewhere, so you have to trust them. And that's a concern I have about humans in a world with very smart machines. We experiment with them.

So I like Oracle types where you kind of just know that it's right. Turing likes Oracle machines. They know the right answer. How? Who knows? But they pull it out from somewhere, so you have to trust them. And that's a concern I have about humans in a world with very smart machines. We experiment with them.

We see after a while, okay, they've always been right before, and we start trusting them without any verification of what they're saying.

We see after a while, okay, they've always been right before, and we start trusting them without any verification of what they're saying.

We see after a while, okay, they've always been right before, and we start trusting them without any verification of what they're saying.

We remove ourselves from that process. We are not scientists who understand the world. We are humans who get new data presented to us.

We remove ourselves from that process. We are not scientists who understand the world. We are humans who get new data presented to us.

We remove ourselves from that process. We are not scientists who understand the world. We are humans who get new data presented to us.

preserved portion of it can be done. But in terms of mathematical verification, it's kind of useless. You're saying you are the greatest guy in the world because you are saying it. It's circular and not very helpful, but it's consistent. We know that within that world, you have verified that system. In a paper, I try to kind of brute force all possible verifiers.

preserved portion of it can be done. But in terms of mathematical verification, it's kind of useless. You're saying you are the greatest guy in the world because you are saying it. It's circular and not very helpful, but it's consistent. We know that within that world, you have verified that system. In a paper, I try to kind of brute force all possible verifiers.

preserved portion of it can be done. But in terms of mathematical verification, it's kind of useless. You're saying you are the greatest guy in the world because you are saying it. It's circular and not very helpful, but it's consistent. We know that within that world, you have verified that system. In a paper, I try to kind of brute force all possible verifiers.

It doesn't mean that this one is particularly important to us.