Ron Rudson
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
It's bulls**t. Plain and simple. When they say affordability, and I've heard this line ever since I first went to a meeting in 1989, what they're meaning is profitability. Affordability to them means being able to close sales, hand the keys, and walk away.
It's bulls**t. Plain and simple. When they say affordability, and I've heard this line ever since I first went to a meeting in 1989, what they're meaning is profitability. Affordability to them means being able to close sales, hand the keys, and walk away.
It's bulls**t. Plain and simple. When they say affordability, and I've heard this line ever since I first went to a meeting in 1989, what they're meaning is profitability. Affordability to them means being able to close sales, hand the keys, and walk away.
Listen, I saw the association fight for a decade, fall on its sword and twist it over a $200 exhaust fan requirement. They spent thousands of dollars and staff hours You know, just grinding on this issue of a requirement for an exhaust fan.
Listen, I saw the association fight for a decade, fall on its sword and twist it over a $200 exhaust fan requirement. They spent thousands of dollars and staff hours You know, just grinding on this issue of a requirement for an exhaust fan.
Listen, I saw the association fight for a decade, fall on its sword and twist it over a $200 exhaust fan requirement. They spent thousands of dollars and staff hours You know, just grinding on this issue of a requirement for an exhaust fan.
They don't want those maps updated because all of a sudden a lot of areas that were previously developed are off limits. Or the rates, because of the higher proven risk, go up substantially.
They don't want those maps updated because all of a sudden a lot of areas that were previously developed are off limits. Or the rates, because of the higher proven risk, go up substantially.
They don't want those maps updated because all of a sudden a lot of areas that were previously developed are off limits. Or the rates, because of the higher proven risk, go up substantially.
What was its main goal? Advocacy. Look, trade associations exist for one reason, and that is to help facilitate trade. the profit-making ability of their members. And it really doesn't owe an apology for that. What it owes an apology for is for pretending they're something that they're not.
What was its main goal? Advocacy. Look, trade associations exist for one reason, and that is to help facilitate trade. the profit-making ability of their members. And it really doesn't owe an apology for that. What it owes an apology for is for pretending they're something that they're not.
What was its main goal? Advocacy. Look, trade associations exist for one reason, and that is to help facilitate trade. the profit-making ability of their members. And it really doesn't owe an apology for that. What it owes an apology for is for pretending they're something that they're not.
They pretend that they're an advocate for the American homebuyer, and it's all for show because what it's really about is figuring out how you can warehouse the American homebuyer for the least amount of cost and the most amount of profit.
They pretend that they're an advocate for the American homebuyer, and it's all for show because what it's really about is figuring out how you can warehouse the American homebuyer for the least amount of cost and the most amount of profit.
They pretend that they're an advocate for the American homebuyer, and it's all for show because what it's really about is figuring out how you can warehouse the American homebuyer for the least amount of cost and the most amount of profit.
Good to be with you, Sarah.
Good to be with you, Sarah.
Good to be with you, Sarah.
We do seem to be walking up to it. The phrase refers to a conflict between constitutional powers that has no clear resolution in the Constitution itself. Now, Trump suggests that a judge cannot contradict him because that judge didn't run for president.
We do seem to be walking up to it. The phrase refers to a conflict between constitutional powers that has no clear resolution in the Constitution itself. Now, Trump suggests that a judge cannot contradict him because that judge didn't run for president.