Rosemary Scappiccio

Well, I mean, I think it was the appropriate thing to do. What got me angry was that the Commonwealth is taking the position that the dismissal was because Carly Medeiros was lying. And I don't think that's the reason for the dismissal at all. I think it was because the police officers were lying, and they knew that we were going to expose their lies.

Well, I mean, I think it was the appropriate thing to do. What got me angry was that the Commonwealth is taking the position that the dismissal was because Carly Medeiros was lying. And I don't think that's the reason for the dismissal at all. I think it was because the police officers were lying, and they knew that we were going to expose their lies.

Judge Dupuy made a determination that Carly was not credible. She based that on...

Judge Dupuy made a determination that Carly was not credible. She based that on...

Barbosa's testimony that he had never been in touch with Kali outside of this one controlled by and that's just not true and and we were ready willing and able to prove that today with not only Kali's testimony but documents and putting Barbosa on the stand and you know ultimately the Commonwealth said enough is enough and they dismissed it so we didn't get the opportunity to do that.

Barbosa's testimony that he had never been in touch with Kali outside of this one controlled by and that's just not true and and we were ready willing and able to prove that today with not only Kali's testimony but documents and putting Barbosa on the stand and you know ultimately the Commonwealth said enough is enough and they dismissed it so we didn't get the opportunity to do that.

Yes.

Yes.

Egregious misconduct. Not just misconduct. Egregious misconduct.

Egregious misconduct. Not just misconduct. Egregious misconduct.

What I think should happen, any time that a police officer gets found to have engaged in misconduct, what should be happening with this district attorney's office is they should be going back through every single solitary case that that cop put his hands on and determine whether or not he lied in that case too, if the informant in that case was really an informant, or if this was all based on his sleeping with Kali Medeiros.

What I think should happen, any time that a police officer gets found to have engaged in misconduct, what should be happening with this district attorney's office is they should be going back through every single solitary case that that cop put his hands on and determine whether or not he lied in that case too, if the informant in that case was really an informant, or if this was all based on his sleeping with Kali Medeiros.

I wouldn't assume that if my life depended on it. I think they should. Ethically, they told us they couldn't go forward on this because of the egregious misconduct, but nobody has notified me that there's a single investigation or that they need anything that we've uncovered in this case.

I wouldn't assume that if my life depended on it. I think they should. Ethically, they told us they couldn't go forward on this because of the egregious misconduct, but nobody has notified me that there's a single investigation or that they need anything that we've uncovered in this case.

They have a vested interest in not exposing these police officers because all of their drug cases and their gang cases depend on it. If these cops are lying, then what happens to all of the pending cases? What happens to the cases that they already testified in? You've got to ask yourself that question. The Commonwealth agreed in this case that it was egregious with Congress.

They have a vested interest in not exposing these police officers because all of their drug cases and their gang cases depend on it. If these cops are lying, then what happens to all of the pending cases? What happens to the cases that they already testified in? You've got to ask yourself that question. The Commonwealth agreed in this case that it was egregious with Congress.

So what are you going to do about it? I'm thrilled that they're dismissing the case. It was the right result. But here's the problem. What are you going to do, Commonwealth of Massachusetts? What are you going to do, the police department? What are you going to do, the attorney general's office? What are you going to do, the federal government? Who's going to look into this?

So what are you going to do about it? I'm thrilled that they're dismissing the case. It was the right result. But here's the problem. What are you going to do, Commonwealth of Massachusetts? What are you going to do, the police department? What are you going to do, the attorney general's office? What are you going to do, the federal government? Who's going to look into this?

Because we don't have the power to do it. Our power was what was going to happen today. And they quashed that by dismissing the case.

Because we don't have the power to do it. Our power was what was going to happen today. And they quashed that by dismissing the case.