Ryan Adams

In theory, everything.

Yeah, in theory, everything.

I mean, if Dario is even a small percentage correct, then that can be a massive supply shock in a good way, supply economic shock.

to our entire economy.

And it's essentially a progressive policy to give healthcare intelligence to every citizen of the United States.

We could do that if we have an abundance agenda for intelligence.

But it seems if you go full decel and you just do moratoriums on things, then you don't get that.

Yeah, like New York State Senate, there was a bill being considered, Senate Bill S7263.

And this would basically prohibit AI chatbots from impersonating licensed professionals for therapy or healthcare advice or that sort of thing, which, of course...

drives the cost.

It doesn't decrease the cost of providing those services if someone wants to get those inside of an AI or a chatbot, right?

So that does seem to be part of the decelerationist agenda seeping into politics.

I don't know if that'll pass or not, but...

I was kind of wondering, an undercurrent of this whole AI populism and our discussion today has been growing wealth inequality.

And I sort of wonder if the AI populism is just a proxy battle in some way or bundling of the greater problem of wealth inequality.

And as I look at something like wealth inequality, I'm sort of like,

wondering what the problems inside of that actually are.

So if everyone is getting wealthier, but the top are getting wealthier at a faster pace, at some level, you look at that system, you'd say, okay, what's the problem as long as we're all getting wealthier?

But then sometimes I wonder if wealth inequality, we call it wealth inequality, but it's really more about power inequality.

And it's more about a concern that a certain group of elites are able to translate that wealth into coercive, direct power inequality.