Ryan Lufkin

These are the human skills and their problem solving, their creative thinking, their communication, their consensus building, their things like that.

And that's why, to your point, we will always have jobs.

We will always have the ability because we need to be able to connect with other humans while we let AI do the more mundane tasks.

And in some cases, yeah, it might get math wrong.

It might get very convoluted.

An accountant, the idea of an accountant giving up control of their books or understanding the formulas and letting them run without being able to double check that is scary.

And not every job needs advanced math.

If we're in marketing, I don't use advanced math on a daily basis, but there are occasions when it's important to have that reasoning, that logic.

That's where the tension, especially in K-12, comes right now.

There's this kind of undercurrent of anti-technology going on.

But then our STEM scores are going in the toilet.

How do we address STEM if, you know, science, technology, and math, science, technology, engineering, math?

How do we do that if we're not going to actually leverage technology in the teaching of those things?

And meanwhile, you've got a group that's pushing that we should be teaching cursive again.

And why aren't we teaching cursive in college school?

No one writes long-form letters during the Civil War when they would write the, you know, pen poetic letters.

Yes.

We don't do that anymore.

There's been a lot of nudist articles on that lately.

Who's pushing that and why?