Ryan Seacrest
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
That is going to hurt them and it's going to be so toxic and it makes them look like they can't govern. And, you know, they say they didn't get anything out of it. They got the old Biden budget. I mean, there was like 10 billion in cuts. There was nothing really in cuts substantial. But it makes them look bad, makes them look like they can't govern. And who replaces Schumer? I don't know.
That is going to hurt them and it's going to be so toxic and it makes them look like they can't govern. And, you know, they say they didn't get anything out of it. They got the old Biden budget. I mean, there was like 10 billion in cuts. There was nothing really in cuts substantial. But it makes them look bad, makes them look like they can't govern. And who replaces Schumer? I don't know.
That is going to hurt them and it's going to be so toxic and it makes them look like they can't govern. And, you know, they say they didn't get anything out of it. They got the old Biden budget. I mean, there was like 10 billion in cuts. There was nothing really in cuts substantial. But it makes them look bad, makes them look like they can't govern. And who replaces Schumer? I don't know.
It used to be with Dick Durbin. He's 83. He's on his way out. It won't be Bernie. I mean, Elizabeth Warren is 76. It'd have to be somebody who can bring in a lot of money because that's really a big part of the job as being leaders, who can raise a lot of money. It's not even Kirsten Gillibrand. They have a big, big issue.
It used to be with Dick Durbin. He's 83. He's on his way out. It won't be Bernie. I mean, Elizabeth Warren is 76. It'd have to be somebody who can bring in a lot of money because that's really a big part of the job as being leaders, who can raise a lot of money. It's not even Kirsten Gillibrand. They have a big, big issue.
It used to be with Dick Durbin. He's 83. He's on his way out. It won't be Bernie. I mean, Elizabeth Warren is 76. It'd have to be somebody who can bring in a lot of money because that's really a big part of the job as being leaders, who can raise a lot of money. It's not even Kirsten Gillibrand. They have a big, big issue.
The best fundraiser on the Republican side is, I'm pretty sure it's Tim Scott, for sure, on the Senate side. Tim Scott's the best fundraiser. On the Democratic side, I believe it's Schumer and his PACs. Schumer and his PACs raise over $100 million a year.
The best fundraiser on the Republican side is, I'm pretty sure it's Tim Scott, for sure, on the Senate side. Tim Scott's the best fundraiser. On the Democratic side, I believe it's Schumer and his PACs. Schumer and his PACs raise over $100 million a year.
The best fundraiser on the Republican side is, I'm pretty sure it's Tim Scott, for sure, on the Senate side. Tim Scott's the best fundraiser. On the Democratic side, I believe it's Schumer and his PACs. Schumer and his PACs raise over $100 million a year.
AOC for sure. Corey Bush is AOC. Yeah. AOC raises a bucket loads of money. Yeah. And she usually gives it all away.
AOC for sure. Corey Bush is AOC. Yeah. AOC raises a bucket loads of money. Yeah. And she usually gives it all away.
AOC for sure. Corey Bush is AOC. Yeah. AOC raises a bucket loads of money. Yeah. And she usually gives it all away.
So this is the episode for a numbers game podcast that's coming out next Monday. I'm super excited. But this data comes from David Shore, who's a Democrat, a data scientist. He's brilliant. Very, very smart. His data. And he did a really deep data, not only like exit polling, but where people were voting and looking at voting files.
So this is the episode for a numbers game podcast that's coming out next Monday. I'm super excited. But this data comes from David Shore, who's a Democrat, a data scientist. He's brilliant. Very, very smart. His data. And he did a really deep data, not only like exit polling, but where people were voting and looking at voting files.
So this is the episode for a numbers game podcast that's coming out next Monday. I'm super excited. But this data comes from David Shore, who's a Democrat, a data scientist. He's brilliant. Very, very smart. His data. And he did a really deep data, not only like exit polling, but where people were voting and looking at voting files.
What happened was between 2016 and 2020, Trump lost about one to two percent of the white vote in between those two elections. He gained all that back in 2024. So there were Trump or Gary Johnson, Biden, Trump voters. There was that swing. Basically, all the people voted for Gary Johnson instead of Hillary and then voted for Biden came back to Trump.
What happened was between 2016 and 2020, Trump lost about one to two percent of the white vote in between those two elections. He gained all that back in 2024. So there were Trump or Gary Johnson, Biden, Trump voters. There was that swing. Basically, all the people voted for Gary Johnson instead of Hillary and then voted for Biden came back to Trump.
What happened was between 2016 and 2020, Trump lost about one to two percent of the white vote in between those two elections. He gained all that back in 2024. So there were Trump or Gary Johnson, Biden, Trump voters. There was that swing. Basically, all the people voted for Gary Johnson instead of Hillary and then voted for Biden came back to Trump.
that was uh that was worth 1.5 percent of his three-point national game half came from white people the other half came from minorities he didn't gain that much with blacks it was a small amount the biggest was black conservatives he gained about eight points over the course of the last eight years but among hispanic moderates he gained 23 points in 2016 hillary won 81 of hispanic moderates
that was uh that was worth 1.5 percent of his three-point national game half came from white people the other half came from minorities he didn't gain that much with blacks it was a small amount the biggest was black conservatives he gained about eight points over the course of the last eight years but among hispanic moderates he gained 23 points in 2016 hillary won 81 of hispanic moderates