Ryan Sean Adams

And if they go with this approach, then that gives them a way to more credibly, neutrally, like kind of like freeze the assets because they're not completely freezing it.

If you can prove ownership, then you can access the old legacy Bitcoin.

So messy.

This is so messy, no matter how you cut it.

Nick Carter's charge is that basically what many of the Bitcoin core devs are doing is kind of burying their head in the sand and saying today is not real or it's not going to be real for like 20 to 30 years.

That's what he's saying they're doing.

I actually agree with you.

That's what I would do too.

I would let the treasure hunt happen.

I would let the salvage happen.

I would not touch anything.

That is the key thing that Bitcoin does and just let the chips fall where they may.

Let me ask you the same question though.

So it's not just some portion of Bitcoin supply that is...

post-quantum insecure.

Also, Ethereum has this problem too, but with a different percent of supply.

Can you map that same problem?

So we get to a post-QDA scenario.

Oh my God, somebody, let's say they didn't freeze and burn.

Somebody is grabbing, scooping up the Satoshi Bitcoin.