Sam Altman

Many of the critics, and I really respect this, have said, hey, a lot of the problems that I had with 3.5 are much better in 4.0.

But also, no two people are ever going to agree that one single model is unbiased on every topic.

And I think the answer there is just going to be to give users more personalized control, granular control over time.

When I was a little kid, I thought building AI, we didn't really call it AGI at the time.

I thought building AI would be the coolest thing ever.

I never really thought I would get the chance to work on it.

But if you had told me that not only I would get the chance to work on it, but that after making a very, very larval proto-AGI thing, that the thing I'd have to spend my time on is...

trying to argue with people about whether the number of characters that said nice things about one person was different than the number of characters that said nice about some other person.

If you hand people an AGI and that's what they want to do, I wouldn't have believed you.

But I understand it more now.

And I do have empathy for it.

So I get it.

It's just like I...

And I also, like, I get why this is such an important issue.

This is a really important issue.

But that somehow we, like...

Somehow, this is the thing that we get caught up in versus like, what is this going to mean for our future?

Now, maybe you say, this is critical to what this is going to mean for our future.

The thing that it says more characters about this person than this person and who's deciding that and how it's being decided and how the users get control over that.

Maybe that is the most important issue.