Sam Altman

There are people doing good work there.

You know, if you ask the same question 10,000 times and you rank the outputs from best to worst, what most people see is, of course, something around output 5,000.

But the output that gets all of the Twitter attention is output 10,000.

Yeah.

And this is something that I think the world will just have to adapt to with these models is that sometimes there's a really egregiously dumb answer.

And in a world where you click screenshot and share,

that might not be representative.

Now already we're noticing a lot more people respond to those things saying, well, I tried it and got this.

And so I think we are building up the antibodies there, but it's a new thing.

I mean, evidently there doesn't seem to be.

We keep doing our thing, you know?

I'm sure it has all sorts of subtle effects.

I don't fully understand, but I don't perceive much of that.

I mean, we're happy to admit when we're wrong.

We want to get better and better.

I think we're pretty good about trying to listen to every piece of criticism, think it through, internalize what we agree with.

But like the breathless clickbait headlines, you know, try to let those flow through us.

We do have systems that try to figure out, you know, try to learn when a question is something that we're supposed to – we call it refusals, refuse to answer.

It is early and imperfect.

We're, again, the spirit of building in public and –