Sam Altman

So we put it out, but we put it out in a way we can make changes.

Well, to be clear, I don't, nor does anyone else at OpenAI, I said they're like reading all the chat GPT messages.

But from what I hear people using it for, at least the people I talk to, and from what I see on Twitter, we are definitely mostly good.

And B, we really want to push on the edges of these systems.

And we really want to test out some darker theories of the world.

Like math is true.

And the origin of COVID is not agreed upon as ground truth.

Those are the two things.

And then there's stuff that's like certainly not true.

But between that first and second milestone, there's a lot of disagreement.

What do you know is true?

What are you absolutely certain is true?

And then- Yeah, too much amphetamines cause the war is like a great, even if not true, simple explanation that feels-

and excuses a lot of other probably much darker human truths.

I think a lot of the answers, you know, like if you ask GPT-4, just to stick on the same topic, did COVID leak from a lab?

I expect you would get a reasonable answer.

Heavy circumstantial evidence on either side.

Man, remember when the social media platforms were banning people for saying it was a lab leak?

We have a different set of challenges faced by the previous generation of companies, which is,

People talk about free speech issues with GPT, but it's not quite the same thing.