Sam Altman

explain to educate people that this is a tool and not a creature i think i yes but i also think there will be a room in society for creatures and we should draw hard lines between those if something's a creature i'm happy for people to like think of it and talk about it as a creature but i think it is dangerous to project creatureness onto a tool that's one perspective

Yeah, so if there's like kind of UI affordances that,

I understand that.

I still think we want to be pretty careful with it.

Or just the more you think that it's doing something or should be able to do something or rely on it for something that it's not capable of.

There are companies now that offer, for lack of a better word, like romantic companionship AIs.

Yeah.

I personally don't feel any interest in that.

But I understand why other people do.

Have you spent a lot of time interacting with Replica or anything similar?

Look, there are going to be very interactive GPT-4 powered pets or whatever.

Robots, companions, and

A lot of people seem really excited about that.

No, I think you do want...

The style of the way GPT-4 talks to you really matters.

You probably want something different than what I want, but we both probably want something different than the current GPT-4.

I mean, what I'm excited for is like, please explain to me how all the physics works and solve all remaining mysteries.

I'll be real happy.

Might be able to help us figure out how to go detect aliens.

And we need to like send some emails to humans and say, can you run these experiments?