Sat Shah

So it's just, it's always hard to find consensus because different people view the game differently.

Yeah, absolutely.

prospect value and how they've played and how I view these individual players I'm slightly higher on the D-men or at least a couple of D-men than I am those forwards yeah no the conversation was about like the hype around Malhotra yes but this was not like an endorsement like I just for myself like I'm sitting here with Malhotra and Bjork 6-7 6-7 6-7 they're at 6-7 for me so I got multiple D-men ahead of them

And again, we've talked about Carl's.

I think we're both fans of his game.

Even though there might be a recognition that Chase Reed looks super dynamic and awesome.

Even if stylistically, I might enjoy Carl's game more.

So, like, that plays a role.

And I think that's where we get the trade down text.

And we were talking about this yesterday.

What's the break point you would trade down to?

I wouldn't be against trading to eight and just taking whoever's available.

You're more of trading to six and still taking your guy.

But I'd rather be at like six.

I do like this text here.

650, 650.

Might take some moving around, but Canucks need to get four of these guys from the draft.

And reminder, they're four of the top 41, so it isn't the top four guys here in this text here, but it's Stenberg, Bjork, Klepov, Suvanto, Cullen, Preston, Morozov, Shilov, Command, BL.

Now, I'd be curious if...

You're going to have opportunities on all those guys, but to the texter's point, can you move around a little bit given the draft quantity they do have?