Satya (Homeless Advocacy)

Yeah, so this is like, it's kind of a complicated situation, but the city has what's what they call their encampment management policy. And it was initially passed, I believe 2020, but it's gone through several evolutions over the past 10 years or so. And it is related to different Supreme Court cases and the settlement that I mentioned earlier.

This policy, it provides certain very limited protections for people who are homeless in the city limits. The city is required by this policy to offer shelter. I believe it's a week for any person who's subject to one of their encampment closures. And also we mentioned the bag and tag policy.

This policy, it provides certain very limited protections for people who are homeless in the city limits. The city is required by this policy to offer shelter. I believe it's a week for any person who's subject to one of their encampment closures. And also we mentioned the bag and tag policy.

This policy, it provides certain very limited protections for people who are homeless in the city limits. The city is required by this policy to offer shelter. I believe it's a week for any person who's subject to one of their encampment closures. And also we mentioned the bag and tag policy.

So if somebody, you know, they are evicted and they move somewhere outside with a tent, they bring all of their possessions with them. They are provided with a, I believe, three foot by three foot like storage space. And this facility that is super inaccessible and kind of like,

So if somebody, you know, they are evicted and they move somewhere outside with a tent, they bring all of their possessions with them. They are provided with a, I believe, three foot by three foot like storage space. And this facility that is super inaccessible and kind of like,

So if somebody, you know, they are evicted and they move somewhere outside with a tent, they bring all of their possessions with them. They are provided with a, I believe, three foot by three foot like storage space. And this facility that is super inaccessible and kind of like,

I don't even know if it's actually real, to be honest, because I've never heard of anybody actually getting their stuff stored and getting it back. But technically, that is a possibility. However, the city will only hold on to it for so long before they throw it away.

I don't even know if it's actually real, to be honest, because I've never heard of anybody actually getting their stuff stored and getting it back. But technically, that is a possibility. However, the city will only hold on to it for so long before they throw it away.

I don't even know if it's actually real, to be honest, because I've never heard of anybody actually getting their stuff stored and getting it back. But technically, that is a possibility. However, the city will only hold on to it for so long before they throw it away.

and then the last protection or provision is the city was until recently supposed to provide people with shelter so a few different supreme court cases are behind that provision specifically and i think a lot of cities kind of had a similar policy framework that they

and then the last protection or provision is the city was until recently supposed to provide people with shelter so a few different supreme court cases are behind that provision specifically and i think a lot of cities kind of had a similar policy framework that they

and then the last protection or provision is the city was until recently supposed to provide people with shelter so a few different supreme court cases are behind that provision specifically and i think a lot of cities kind of had a similar policy framework that they

we're following until the grants pass ruling and i guess like maybe we don't need to get into that too much but basically the the whole idea of that policy was like if somebody is outside living outside and the city uh sweeps them they have to provide them with uh some kind of alternative accommodation because according to like the ninth district court

we're following until the grants pass ruling and i guess like maybe we don't need to get into that too much but basically the the whole idea of that policy was like if somebody is outside living outside and the city uh sweeps them they have to provide them with uh some kind of alternative accommodation because according to like the ninth district court

we're following until the grants pass ruling and i guess like maybe we don't need to get into that too much but basically the the whole idea of that policy was like if somebody is outside living outside and the city uh sweeps them they have to provide them with uh some kind of alternative accommodation because according to like the ninth district court

it was considered like cruel and unusual punishment to penalize somebody for being homeless without offering them some kind of temporary accommodations. And so that was more or less the city's nominal framework for several years, basically. And

it was considered like cruel and unusual punishment to penalize somebody for being homeless without offering them some kind of temporary accommodations. And so that was more or less the city's nominal framework for several years, basically. And

it was considered like cruel and unusual punishment to penalize somebody for being homeless without offering them some kind of temporary accommodations. And so that was more or less the city's nominal framework for several years, basically. And

The degree to which they actually followed these policies, they really didn't, except for in certain situations where there are, for instance, legal advocates who will file injunctions to stop the city from doing a sweep on the basis of failure to provide an alternative accommodation.