Satyar Shah

And that doesn't mean they're going to hire two people.

But again, I'm not very sold on the Dorian thing.

I just wonder, could it be a possibility where you bring somebody like Dorian in as a VP slash the next president, and then you still end up, say, elevating Ryan Johnson to GM?

I mean, I don't think you're nuts about it.

The thing is, is there too much water under the bridge from certain people in the organization when it comes to that?

Like, that's the thing.

It just comes down to would ownership be willing to go down that path again?

Because we've heard mixed things about Gillis in terms of maybe he's willing to come back to Vancouver depending on the situation.

But would ownership be prepared to give him the autonomy and also give the trust over based on how things unfolded last time?

Right.

Yeah, I mean, I don't disagree necessarily.

And I think a lot of people feel the same way.

And I think the way Dorian is viewed in contrast to everything you mentioned about Gillis, and whether this is fair or not, I wanted to get your point, I mean, your take on it.

Is it fair that people view Dorian as just a puppet for ownership?

At least that's what he was in Ottawa.

Because I know that's the perception some have of Pierre Dorian.

Yeah, and I think that's kind of where things are at.

I mean, we could see two executives.

We could see multiple executives.

We could just see the one GM, at least for the time being.