Saul Grover

We need to get legal sex out of legislation for there to be any sort of sex-based rights for women and for men, because there are sex-based rights that exist for men as well. But it's also freedom of speech, freedom of belief and freedom of association.

Because the moment that you have anything in legislation that says that you have to accept a man as a woman or a woman as a man or a man or woman as non-binary or cloud gender or any of the other ridiculous nonsense they've come up with. your freedom of speech, belief, and association is being violated. That is the natural human rights abuse.

Because the moment that you have anything in legislation that says that you have to accept a man as a woman or a woman as a man or a man or woman as non-binary or cloud gender or any of the other ridiculous nonsense they've come up with. your freedom of speech, belief, and association is being violated. That is the natural human rights abuse.

Because the moment that you have anything in legislation that says that you have to accept a man as a woman or a woman as a man or a man or woman as non-binary or cloud gender or any of the other ridiculous nonsense they've come up with. your freedom of speech, belief, and association is being violated. That is the natural human rights abuse.

He's appealing the decision he won. He wants it upgraded from indirect to direct discrimination, and he wants damages increased from $10,000 to at least $30,000, and he wants aggravated damages of at least $10,000. He also wants me to pay his legal fees, which were... always told to the court to be pro bono, but they have now decided are not. I mean, it feels personal at that point.

He's appealing the decision he won. He wants it upgraded from indirect to direct discrimination, and he wants damages increased from $10,000 to at least $30,000, and he wants aggravated damages of at least $10,000. He also wants me to pay his legal fees, which were... always told to the court to be pro bono, but they have now decided are not. I mean, it feels personal at that point.

He's appealing the decision he won. He wants it upgraded from indirect to direct discrimination, and he wants damages increased from $10,000 to at least $30,000, and he wants aggravated damages of at least $10,000. He also wants me to pay his legal fees, which were... always told to the court to be pro bono, but they have now decided are not. I mean, it feels personal at that point.

Like it feels like this is someone who's just trying to financially destroy me because I don't accept that a man can be a woman.

Like it feels like this is someone who's just trying to financially destroy me because I don't accept that a man can be a woman.

Like it feels like this is someone who's just trying to financially destroy me because I don't accept that a man can be a woman.

Do not apologize for a single thing. You have literally done nothing wrong. By acknowledging reality and the truth and saying that men can't be women, there's no crime that you are committing. Not one thing. They do not care. It doesn't matter what you say or what you do. Even if you actually were to just give in and say they're right about everything and I'm sorry and men can come in,

Do not apologize for a single thing. You have literally done nothing wrong. By acknowledging reality and the truth and saying that men can't be women, there's no crime that you are committing. Not one thing. They do not care. It doesn't matter what you say or what you do. Even if you actually were to just give in and say they're right about everything and I'm sorry and men can come in,

Do not apologize for a single thing. You have literally done nothing wrong. By acknowledging reality and the truth and saying that men can't be women, there's no crime that you are committing. Not one thing. They do not care. It doesn't matter what you say or what you do. Even if you actually were to just give in and say they're right about everything and I'm sorry and men can come in,

they still will not forgive you.

they still will not forgive you.

they still will not forgive you.

It's not a human right if it takes away rights from other people. So that's why women's rights don't actually take away rights from other people. They add women to it. It's like civil rights didn't take rights away from other people. The only people who benefit for gender identity in law are men who claim to be women. And they're the ones who take the rights away from other women.

It's not a human right if it takes away rights from other people. So that's why women's rights don't actually take away rights from other people. They add women to it. It's like civil rights didn't take rights away from other people. The only people who benefit for gender identity in law are men who claim to be women. And they're the ones who take the rights away from other women.

It's not a human right if it takes away rights from other people. So that's why women's rights don't actually take away rights from other people. They add women to it. It's like civil rights didn't take rights away from other people. The only people who benefit for gender identity in law are men who claim to be women. And they're the ones who take the rights away from other women.