Scott Galloway

Well, yeah, they still love their Medicare. It's great health care at a low price. They still want, you know, I paid into it. By the way, the majority of people who, once they take out Social Security, take out more than they put in. And it's not called a Social Security pension fund. It's called a Social Security tax, meaning it may not benefit you directly.

Well, yeah, they still love their Medicare. It's great health care at a low price. They still want, you know, I paid into it. By the way, the majority of people who, once they take out Social Security, take out more than they put in. And it's not called a Social Security pension fund. It's called a Social Security tax, meaning it may not benefit you directly.

Well, yeah, they still love their Medicare. It's great health care at a low price. They still want, you know, I paid into it. By the way, the majority of people who, once they take out Social Security, take out more than they put in. And it's not called a Social Security pension fund. It's called a Social Security tax, meaning it may not benefit you directly.

And then people say, Scott, but it's not a deficit issue. Well, of course it's similar. It's a tax on young people. When Social Security was initially conceived, there were 12 young people supporting every retiree. Now it's three to one, and people are working and living 20 or 30 years longer, and Jessica Tarloff and Scott Galloway should not get Social Security.

And then people say, Scott, but it's not a deficit issue. Well, of course it's similar. It's a tax on young people. When Social Security was initially conceived, there were 12 young people supporting every retiree. Now it's three to one, and people are working and living 20 or 30 years longer, and Jessica Tarloff and Scott Galloway should not get Social Security.

And then people say, Scott, but it's not a deficit issue. Well, of course it's similar. It's a tax on young people. When Social Security was initially conceived, there were 12 young people supporting every retiree. Now it's three to one, and people are working and living 20 or 30 years longer, and Jessica Tarloff and Scott Galloway should not get Social Security.

And here's the problem, going back to we need age limits in Congress. Say we're able to continue to live irresponsibly and live beyond our means and continue to take advantage of the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, which has been earned through hard work and fiscal responsibility over 225 years. In 30 years, 75 percent of Congress will be dead. See, above, they're too fucking old.

And here's the problem, going back to we need age limits in Congress. Say we're able to continue to live irresponsibly and live beyond our means and continue to take advantage of the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, which has been earned through hard work and fiscal responsibility over 225 years. In 30 years, 75 percent of Congress will be dead. See, above, they're too fucking old.

And here's the problem, going back to we need age limits in Congress. Say we're able to continue to live irresponsibly and live beyond our means and continue to take advantage of the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, which has been earned through hard work and fiscal responsibility over 225 years. In 30 years, 75 percent of Congress will be dead. See, above, they're too fucking old.

So they don't have a vested interest. I'll be dead by then. I mean, I know this firsthand. I believe where I live in Florida will probably be underwater at some point, but it's probably going to be 50 years and I've done the math. I'm just not that damn worried about it. Whereas a 25-year-old is more concerned with climate change. I understand that.

So they don't have a vested interest. I'll be dead by then. I mean, I know this firsthand. I believe where I live in Florida will probably be underwater at some point, but it's probably going to be 50 years and I've done the math. I'm just not that damn worried about it. Whereas a 25-year-old is more concerned with climate change. I understand that.

So they don't have a vested interest. I'll be dead by then. I mean, I know this firsthand. I believe where I live in Florida will probably be underwater at some point, but it's probably going to be 50 years and I've done the math. I'm just not that damn worried about it. Whereas a 25-year-old is more concerned with climate change. I understand that.

And we need more 25-year-olds in Congress such that we can be a little bit more future forward, such that we can be thinking about the requisite long-term investments to ensure our kids and grandkids have the same types of opportunities we do. So what is the incentive for people in Congress who are really fucking old? Well, whatever.

And we need more 25-year-olds in Congress such that we can be a little bit more future forward, such that we can be thinking about the requisite long-term investments to ensure our kids and grandkids have the same types of opportunities we do. So what is the incentive for people in Congress who are really fucking old? Well, whatever.

And we need more 25-year-olds in Congress such that we can be a little bit more future forward, such that we can be thinking about the requisite long-term investments to ensure our kids and grandkids have the same types of opportunities we do. So what is the incentive for people in Congress who are really fucking old? Well, whatever.

Future generations will deal with warming oceans and an unsustainable debt load. As long as my credit card continues to be accepted and I can continue feeding at the trough until I'm dead, I'm down with these ridiculously short-term policies.

Future generations will deal with warming oceans and an unsustainable debt load. As long as my credit card continues to be accepted and I can continue feeding at the trough until I'm dead, I'm down with these ridiculously short-term policies.

Future generations will deal with warming oceans and an unsustainable debt load. As long as my credit card continues to be accepted and I can continue feeding at the trough until I'm dead, I'm down with these ridiculously short-term policies.

These tax cuts, which largely benefit the wealthy, Republicans aren't cutting defense spending, Social Security, or Medicare, all which would be unpopular with the constituents. Instead, they're going after the health and nutrition programs for the poorest Americans, which again is Latin for the youngest Americans. So, again, this is the bill just it goes from bad to worse here.

These tax cuts, which largely benefit the wealthy, Republicans aren't cutting defense spending, Social Security, or Medicare, all which would be unpopular with the constituents. Instead, they're going after the health and nutrition programs for the poorest Americans, which again is Latin for the youngest Americans. So, again, this is the bill just it goes from bad to worse here.