Scott Galloway

That would be great.

Because you're going to have a lot of people who wake up and have $20 million and think, I'm going to give $2 million to the local food bank.

Or I'm going to give $50,000.

I'm involved with the University of California.

They're all revising their giving goals up for next year because of the IPOs coming down.

And they have so many alumni

I'm not talking about—Elon Musk, I think it would be—you could make a credible argument that he's not the most philanthropic person.

I get that.

And you can definitely make an argument that Mackenzie Scott and Melinda French Gates are more philanthropic than their husbands.

But when you see these types of liquidity events, local philanthropies surge in terms of— That would be great.

—in terms of money.

Look, for all of SpaceX's problems and income inequality, there isn't a nation on Earth that wouldn't kill to have those problems.

Elon Musk, in my view, can probably decide who the next president is.

He spent $250 million.

and had influence on the election.

Maybe he didn't decide it, but he had influence on it.

Absolutely.

What happens if he decides to put 2.5% of his net worth or 25 billion or 100 times what he spent last time?

And also, to be fair, are we comfortable

And he deserves credit.