Scott Horton

There never was any reprocessing of weapons fuel.

But there was concrete.

This intelligence that came out.

Who put that into Israeli claims?

Not verified by the U.S.

and the Wall Street Journal anywhere, right?

Let's talk about all of my list of refutations of all your false claims from 10 years ago.

Who's the dog that didn't bark there?

The current director of national intelligence who issued her threat assessment.

Trump's director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, who issued her threat assessment in February that repeated the exact same language.

from the National Intelligence Estimate of 2007 and that the CIA and the National Intelligence Council have reaffirmed repeatedly ever since then, which is that Supreme Leader has not decided to pursue nuclear weapons.

He has not made the political decision to pursue nuclear weapons.

She testified, in fact, under oath in front of the Senate in March.

And then, according to CNN and The New York Times, there was a brand new assessment that was put together the week before the attack.

was launched, reaffirming the same thing.

And at least in history, if you read it in Haaretz, Mossad agreed with the CIA.

That's not true at all, right?

They have to resort to a crude analogy about football yard lines because they can't say the truth, which is that they had zero weapons-grade uranium.

They were not producing it.

They were trying to get the United States back in the deal that they are still officially within the JCPOA with the rest of the U.N.