Scott Horton

No enrichment, zero enrichment.

But that's a red line.

Everyone knows that there's... And even now, it's probably less likely than ever that they're going to give up enrichment.

Sure, they bombed Porto, but they didn't destroy every last centrifuge in that place.

And...

The Iranians are already announcing that they're already begun construction on another facility under a taller mountain, buried even deeper.

And, you know, they figured out how to enrich uranium hexafluoride gas, you know, what, 20 years ago now.

And they will always be able to.

And this is the slippery slope that we're on with these wars is, in fact, I saw a friend here on TV the other day, as he almost pretty much just implied there, saying, well, now Trump has to go in.

You know, we were told it's just Israel doing it.

Don't worry.

But then, no, Trump has to hit Fordow or else now they'll break out toward a nuclear weapon.

So in for a penny, in for a pound, in for a ton.

And now once we bomb Fordow again and Natanz again and the new facility again, then it'll be decided that, no, as Benjamin Netanyahu said the other day,

You know what would really solve this problem?

If we just kill the Ayatollah, then everything will be fine.

Then we'll have a regime change, and then what?

Then we'll have a civil war with bin Ladenites again in the catbird seat, just like George Bush put them in Iraq and Barack Obama put them in Libya and in Syria.

And we'll have Azeris and Baluki suicide bombers and Shiite revolutionaries and whoever all vying for power in the new absolute chaos stand.

If you listen to the administration and Mr. Dubois, they're essentially just implying that like, oh, yeah, mission accomplished.