Scott Jennings

Are you suggesting that the president is not the commander-in-chief of the military?

Are you suggesting that the president is not the commander-in-chief of the military?

I'm interested in this conversation. He's going to put someone in charge who will contravene the Constitution. Like, who? What do you mean by that? The president is in charge of the military, is he not? You said he's going to put someone in charge of the military?

I'm interested in this conversation. He's going to put someone in charge who will contravene the Constitution. Like, who? What do you mean by that? The president is in charge of the military, is he not? You said he's going to put someone in charge of the military?

I'm interested in this conversation. He's going to put someone in charge who will contravene the Constitution. Like, who? What do you mean by that? The president is in charge of the military, is he not? You said he's going to put someone in charge of the military?

He was elected president. We, according to the Constitution, vest all executive authority in a president. And the concept that the military should be an independent agency or that the bureaucracy should resist the political leadership of this government is extraordinarily dangerous. That's literally not what we said. I'm just repeating back to you your own words.

He was elected president. We, according to the Constitution, vest all executive authority in a president. And the concept that the military should be an independent agency or that the bureaucracy should resist the political leadership of this government is extraordinarily dangerous. That's literally not what we said. I'm just repeating back to you your own words.

He was elected president. We, according to the Constitution, vest all executive authority in a president. And the concept that the military should be an independent agency or that the bureaucracy should resist the political leadership of this government is extraordinarily dangerous. That's literally not what we said. I'm just repeating back to you your own words.

We're doing a complete review of every single aspect of what happened with the botched withdrawal of Afghanistan and plan to have full accountability. It's one of the first things we announced at the Defense Department for that reason, sir. Certainly, General Raisin Kane, who's on his way in, was not a part of that.

We're doing a complete review of every single aspect of what happened with the botched withdrawal of Afghanistan and plan to have full accountability. It's one of the first things we announced at the Defense Department for that reason, sir. Certainly, General Raisin Kane, who's on his way in, was not a part of that.

We're doing a complete review of every single aspect of what happened with the botched withdrawal of Afghanistan and plan to have full accountability. It's one of the first things we announced at the Defense Department for that reason, sir. Certainly, General Raisin Kane, who's on his way in, was not a part of that.

Instead, he was a part of leading the effort against ISIS by untying the hands of warfighters and finishing the job properly and bringing our troops home. So we're taking a very different view, obviously, than the previous administration, and there will be full accountability.

Instead, he was a part of leading the effort against ISIS by untying the hands of warfighters and finishing the job properly and bringing our troops home. So we're taking a very different view, obviously, than the previous administration, and there will be full accountability.

Instead, he was a part of leading the effort against ISIS by untying the hands of warfighters and finishing the job properly and bringing our troops home. So we're taking a very different view, obviously, than the previous administration, and there will be full accountability.

And then you have these individual district court judges setting effectively broad federal policy that is specifically reserved for the president of the United States. I think we do have a constitutional crisis, and it's being caused by these judges. They're not here to tell us... They're not here to tell us how to spend the money. They're not here to set broad federal policy.

And then you have these individual district court judges setting effectively broad federal policy that is specifically reserved for the president of the United States. I think we do have a constitutional crisis, and it's being caused by these judges. They're not here to tell us... They're not here to tell us how to spend the money. They're not here to set broad federal policy.

And then you have these individual district court judges setting effectively broad federal policy that is specifically reserved for the president of the United States. I think we do have a constitutional crisis, and it's being caused by these judges. They're not here to tell us... They're not here to tell us how to spend the money. They're not here to set broad federal policy.

That is the president's job as elected by the people. These judges are supposed to be settling discrete, specific matters, not policy-setting. I think Vance is right. I think Trump has a point. and these judges want nothing more to continue the lawfare against Trump. I don't think anybody...

That is the president's job as elected by the people. These judges are supposed to be settling discrete, specific matters, not policy-setting. I think Vance is right. I think Trump has a point. and these judges want nothing more to continue the lawfare against Trump. I don't think anybody...

That is the president's job as elected by the people. These judges are supposed to be settling discrete, specific matters, not policy-setting. I think Vance is right. I think Trump has a point. and these judges want nothing more to continue the lawfare against Trump. I don't think anybody...