Scott Weinberger
๐ค SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
And we've seen this before when an accused accomplice in a crime claims to have been a victim of domestic violence and had only participated in that crime under a threat of violence to themselves.
And we've seen this before when an accused accomplice in a crime claims to have been a victim of domestic violence and had only participated in that crime under a threat of violence to themselves.
Choice of evils is the person essentially concedes that they engaged in the conduct, but the argument is that they engaged in the conduct only to avoid a greater evil being visited upon them. And her argument was essentially that if I didn't do it, he was going to beat me up or kill me. And so I participated in this only because I had no other choice. Even on the day of the incident,
Choice of evils is the person essentially concedes that they engaged in the conduct, but the argument is that they engaged in the conduct only to avoid a greater evil being visited upon them. And her argument was essentially that if I didn't do it, he was going to beat me up or kill me. And so I participated in this only because I had no other choice. Even on the day of the incident,
Defendant Dadurant claimed in her petition and even on the witness stand that on the date of the murder that Brown had violently assaulted her, put her in their face a number of times.
Defendant Dadurant claimed in her petition and even on the witness stand that on the date of the murder that Brown had violently assaulted her, put her in their face a number of times.
But as the prosecutor was quick to point out, there were multiple reasons to doubt her story.
But as the prosecutor was quick to point out, there were multiple reasons to doubt her story.
I had pictures of her that day, and she was completely unscathed. And so those pictures just completely torpedoed any contention that she had been punched or abused that day.
I had pictures of her that day, and she was completely unscathed. And so those pictures just completely torpedoed any contention that she had been punched or abused that day.
At the time of her arrest, She had Telma's Bank of Hawaii debit card on her person. Furthermore, Walmart surveillance footage depicts her using that bank card to make purchases at Walmart. And there was also a receipt found in their belongings where that debit card was used to make a purchase at Taco Bell. So think about what these two people did, right?
At the time of her arrest, She had Telma's Bank of Hawaii debit card on her person. Furthermore, Walmart surveillance footage depicts her using that bank card to make purchases at Walmart. And there was also a receipt found in their belongings where that debit card was used to make a purchase at Taco Bell. So think about what these two people did, right?
They fled the crime scene, went up to this mall, ate at Taco Bell, and went shopping in Walmart.
They fled the crime scene, went up to this mall, ate at Taco Bell, and went shopping in Walmart.
And if any of the jurors were still questioning Dandaran's role in the cold-blooded murder of Thelma Boyneville, this detail removed all doubt.
And if any of the jurors were still questioning Dandaran's role in the cold-blooded murder of Thelma Boyneville, this detail removed all doubt.
I think the most chilling detail about Haley Dandaran is that at the time of her arrest, she was wearing the victim's earrings.
I think the most chilling detail about Haley Dandaran is that at the time of her arrest, she was wearing the victim's earrings.
I didn't push too much the motive because even that, when you hear yourself saying it out loud, that doesn't even make sense. They killed the woman because she interrupted the burglary. But why precisely they chose to do it, there was really no answer to that. And neither defendant provided an answer on direct or cross-examination.
I didn't push too much the motive because even that, when you hear yourself saying it out loud, that doesn't even make sense. They killed the woman because she interrupted the burglary. But why precisely they chose to do it, there was really no answer to that. And neither defendant provided an answer on direct or cross-examination.