Scott Wolter

In multiple disciplines, geology, language, runes, dialect, grammar, medieval dating practices, history of the late 19th century, history in the 14th century, right?

That are consistent, cohesive, and conclusive.

This is a genuine medieval artifact, okay?

Let's accept that.

If that's true, then how can there possibly be factual evidence to support the contrary?

It can't exist and it doesn't exist because all the arguments that have ever made do not stand up to scrutiny.

And I will do it again right now on your podcast, okay?

I challenge anybody, anywhere to a debate

How about right here on the Kensington Runestone?

I've done this before.

And you know what I've heard?

Crickets.

Because what happens is when they start to examine and look at the facts, not the hearsay, not the opinion, the facts, there are none that support a hoax, period.

And so that was a pretty grandiose statement I just made.

So let's see if anybody takes me up on it.

Not really anymore.

Well, I don't hear anything.

Yeah.

But here's an interesting thing, and this will get into a really interesting area that I know you can appreciate.

If you go on Wikipedia right now... Now, I haven't done this for a while, so maybe things have changed, and I'm sure somebody will do this.