Sean Hannity

I think it's using every leverage point that we possibly can fiscally to make progress. And there's kind of some big, the big moving parts are economic growth numbers, tariff revenues that are coming in. It's discretionary cuts that I just talked about. That $160 billion in the first year over 10 years is $4 trillion of the answer. And it's mandatory reforms.

And so we need more than $1.6 trillion, but $1.6 trillion is a sizable amount of what is needed to get us back towards balance. And so a combination of all of those different moving parts will get us there over time. We can do a lot of it executively. We're going to need Congress on more of these, particularly on the mandatory side of the reforms and the savings.

And so we need more than $1.6 trillion, but $1.6 trillion is a sizable amount of what is needed to get us back towards balance. And so a combination of all of those different moving parts will get us there over time. We can do a lot of it executively. We're going to need Congress on more of these, particularly on the mandatory side of the reforms and the savings.

And so we need more than $1.6 trillion, but $1.6 trillion is a sizable amount of what is needed to get us back towards balance. And so a combination of all of those different moving parts will get us there over time. We can do a lot of it executively. We're going to need Congress on more of these, particularly on the mandatory side of the reforms and the savings.

And we'll just keep using leverage points to move forward But I think when you look at what we've done on the tariffs, even what is already right now in place, not just kind of being negotiated as part of the reciprocal tariffs, those have sizable impact over 10 years that we never really assumed for in years past.

And we'll just keep using leverage points to move forward But I think when you look at what we've done on the tariffs, even what is already right now in place, not just kind of being negotiated as part of the reciprocal tariffs, those have sizable impact over 10 years that we never really assumed for in years past.

And we'll just keep using leverage points to move forward But I think when you look at what we've done on the tariffs, even what is already right now in place, not just kind of being negotiated as part of the reciprocal tariffs, those have sizable impact over 10 years that we never really assumed for in years past.

And... And... Wait.

And... And... Wait.

is to live in a world where iran has a nuclear weapon the path forward has been given to them and now it's a matter of whether or not they're going to take it and the president was very very clear he would lead the effort to stop them from ever achieving that nuclear weapon and that would mean that statement was obvious in terms of that he would use military force to destroy those facilities we have the capacity obviously to do it but back to this question

is to live in a world where iran has a nuclear weapon the path forward has been given to them and now it's a matter of whether or not they're going to take it and the president was very very clear he would lead the effort to stop them from ever achieving that nuclear weapon and that would mean that statement was obvious in terms of that he would use military force to destroy those facilities we have the capacity obviously to do it but back to this question

is to live in a world where iran has a nuclear weapon the path forward has been given to them and now it's a matter of whether or not they're going to take it and the president was very very clear he would lead the effort to stop them from ever achieving that nuclear weapon and that would mean that statement was obvious in terms of that he would use military force to destroy those facilities we have the capacity obviously to do it but back to this question

Would we need American inspectors and American scientists to shut it down? And would that have to be part of the deal? And anywhere, anyplace, anytime, American inspectors, would they have to agree to that in your mind?

Would we need American inspectors and American scientists to shut it down? And would that have to be part of the deal? And anywhere, anyplace, anytime, American inspectors, would they have to agree to that in your mind?

Would we need American inspectors and American scientists to shut it down? And would that have to be part of the deal? And anywhere, anyplace, anytime, American inspectors, would they have to agree to that in your mind?

Can you take a moral stand and condemn that?

Can you take a moral stand and condemn that?

Can you take a moral stand and condemn that?

I'm not asking you to condemn the system. Taylor, do you condemn people that call for assassination?

I'm not asking you to condemn the system. Taylor, do you condemn people that call for assassination?