Sean Kent

Let's say for argument's sake, he has all this co-conspiracy information about people that they want to know. He can cooperate to get his time cut. That is allowed in the federal system. So if he did have information and got convicted and went to jail for life, he could get his time reduced if he wanted to.

Let's say for argument's sake, he has all this co-conspiracy information about people that they want to know. He can cooperate to get his time cut. That is allowed in the federal system. So if he did have information and got convicted and went to jail for life, he could get his time reduced if he wanted to.

Let's say for argument's sake, he has all this co-conspiracy information about people that they want to know. He can cooperate to get his time cut. That is allowed in the federal system. So if he did have information and got convicted and went to jail for life, he could get his time reduced if he wanted to.

Love that question. And it is and it usually happens when we're representing individuals who are dealing with drug dealers. OK, and usually what ends up happening is exactly what you said. Somebody gets busted. They're on a conspiracy. They're trafficking drugs all over the United States. They get busted like, well, I want my time cut. I'm looking at 30 years.

Love that question. And it is and it usually happens when we're representing individuals who are dealing with drug dealers. OK, and usually what ends up happening is exactly what you said. Somebody gets busted. They're on a conspiracy. They're trafficking drugs all over the United States. They get busted like, well, I want my time cut. I'm looking at 30 years.

Love that question. And it is and it usually happens when we're representing individuals who are dealing with drug dealers. OK, and usually what ends up happening is exactly what you said. Somebody gets busted. They're on a conspiracy. They're trafficking drugs all over the United States. They get busted like, well, I want my time cut. I'm looking at 30 years.

And they say, I can give you a bunch of middling small drug dealers. Well, what ends up happening is the federal government says, sure, give us all of those people. We'll take two years off your sentence. For us to cut your time, you need to give us somebody who has more drugs than you got arrested with. So it's the same theory with Diddy. You want a substantial cut?

And they say, I can give you a bunch of middling small drug dealers. Well, what ends up happening is the federal government says, sure, give us all of those people. We'll take two years off your sentence. For us to cut your time, you need to give us somebody who has more drugs than you got arrested with. So it's the same theory with Diddy. You want a substantial cut?

And they say, I can give you a bunch of middling small drug dealers. Well, what ends up happening is the federal government says, sure, give us all of those people. We'll take two years off your sentence. For us to cut your time, you need to give us somebody who has more drugs than you got arrested with. So it's the same theory with Diddy. You want a substantial cut?

Give us somebody we care about.

Give us somebody we care about.

Give us somebody we care about.

Probably a little bit of both, because the way that I read her testimony is she won 100 percent corroborates Cassie's testimony. And that's something the government is always want to do in trials. They want to make sure that, OK, maybe you didn't believe her, but to not believe Cassie, you now have to disbelieve four or five different individuals with the exact same accounts.

Probably a little bit of both, because the way that I read her testimony is she won 100 percent corroborates Cassie's testimony. And that's something the government is always want to do in trials. They want to make sure that, OK, maybe you didn't believe her, but to not believe Cassie, you now have to disbelieve four or five different individuals with the exact same accounts.

Probably a little bit of both, because the way that I read her testimony is she won 100 percent corroborates Cassie's testimony. And that's something the government is always want to do in trials. They want to make sure that, OK, maybe you didn't believe her, but to not believe Cassie, you now have to disbelieve four or five different individuals with the exact same accounts.

And that's probably what you're noticing in trial is that it's the same story over and over and over again. And the reason I probably also love her Mia's testimony is also because she actually helps with the forced labor charge as well. So she corroborates forced labor. She corroborates Cassie. I think they can get two bites, one apple. So I think that's what they're trying to do.

And that's probably what you're noticing in trial is that it's the same story over and over and over again. And the reason I probably also love her Mia's testimony is also because she actually helps with the forced labor charge as well. So she corroborates forced labor. She corroborates Cassie. I think they can get two bites, one apple. So I think that's what they're trying to do.

And that's probably what you're noticing in trial is that it's the same story over and over and over again. And the reason I probably also love her Mia's testimony is also because she actually helps with the forced labor charge as well. So she corroborates forced labor. She corroborates Cassie. I think they can get two bites, one apple. So I think that's what they're trying to do.

If you think about it, if you hear the law now, you could see where they were going with the testimony. They're just trying to prove that to show that this is forced labor. And if you look at the law, it also says it doesn't matter if that person is being paid. So you can get paid a salary and still be treated this way. That's forced labor and that carries 20 years.

If you think about it, if you hear the law now, you could see where they were going with the testimony. They're just trying to prove that to show that this is forced labor. And if you look at the law, it also says it doesn't matter if that person is being paid. So you can get paid a salary and still be treated this way. That's forced labor and that carries 20 years.