Sean Kent

just because you didn't think it was against the law or just because you turned a blind eye to crimes that were occurred, you are still just as guilty.

For example, if your husband is a drug trafficker and you get all the proceeds and you're living in this multimillion dollar home, but you never ask questions and he doesn't go to work and I've never seen him do drugs, but it is to be assumed, well, that's called willful blindness and you're just as guilty of drug trafficking. So the government can argue that.

For example, if your husband is a drug trafficker and you get all the proceeds and you're living in this multimillion dollar home, but you never ask questions and he doesn't go to work and I've never seen him do drugs, but it is to be assumed, well, that's called willful blindness and you're just as guilty of drug trafficking. So the government can argue that.

For example, if your husband is a drug trafficker and you get all the proceeds and you're living in this multimillion dollar home, but you never ask questions and he doesn't go to work and I've never seen him do drugs, but it is to be assumed, well, that's called willful blindness and you're just as guilty of drug trafficking. So the government can argue that.

The government filed notice against Diddy's team saying, you guys are trying to squeeze an expert in here, not necessarily about insanity, but about Diddy's mens rea. Mens rea is the mental status that is required to form criminal intent. So it specifically says...

The government filed notice against Diddy's team saying, you guys are trying to squeeze an expert in here, not necessarily about insanity, but about Diddy's mens rea. Mens rea is the mental status that is required to form criminal intent. So it specifically says...

The government filed notice against Diddy's team saying, you guys are trying to squeeze an expert in here, not necessarily about insanity, but about Diddy's mens rea. Mens rea is the mental status that is required to form criminal intent. So it specifically says...

The government respectfully submits this memorandum of law in support of its motion to preclude the opinion testimony of Dr. Ellie Owen. The notice testimony relates to the defendant's diminished capacity to form the mens rea required to commit the charged offenses. So they're going to try to bring in an expert that says Diddy could not form the necessary mens rea

The government respectfully submits this memorandum of law in support of its motion to preclude the opinion testimony of Dr. Ellie Owen. The notice testimony relates to the defendant's diminished capacity to form the mens rea required to commit the charged offenses. So they're going to try to bring in an expert that says Diddy could not form the necessary mens rea

The government respectfully submits this memorandum of law in support of its motion to preclude the opinion testimony of Dr. Ellie Owen. The notice testimony relates to the defendant's diminished capacity to form the mens rea required to commit the charged offenses. So they're going to try to bring in an expert that says Diddy could not form the necessary mens rea

the criminal intent to know what he was doing was committing a crime. And my assumption is it is their attempt to say basically, yes, I did it. But, and even if it's a crime, I didn't know it was a crime and I couldn't have formed the necessary mens rea to be convicted of it being a crime. That was a very convoluted answer, but I hope that makes sense. But it's,

the criminal intent to know what he was doing was committing a crime. And my assumption is it is their attempt to say basically, yes, I did it. But, and even if it's a crime, I didn't know it was a crime and I couldn't have formed the necessary mens rea to be convicted of it being a crime. That was a very convoluted answer, but I hope that makes sense. But it's,

the criminal intent to know what he was doing was committing a crime. And my assumption is it is their attempt to say basically, yes, I did it. But, and even if it's a crime, I didn't know it was a crime and I couldn't have formed the necessary mens rea to be convicted of it being a crime. That was a very convoluted answer, but I hope that makes sense. But it's,

Yeah, I see you all shaking your head like what in the world?

Yeah, I see you all shaking your head like what in the world?

Yeah, I see you all shaking your head like what in the world?

Yes and no. There is something under the law called voluntary intoxication. You cannot voluntarily take drugs yourself and then say, I'm crazy and do crazy stuff if you voluntarily induced a drug. And so that's why I don't think they have offered anything of a true insanity defense.

Yes and no. There is something under the law called voluntary intoxication. You cannot voluntarily take drugs yourself and then say, I'm crazy and do crazy stuff if you voluntarily induced a drug. And so that's why I don't think they have offered anything of a true insanity defense.

Yes and no. There is something under the law called voluntary intoxication. You cannot voluntarily take drugs yourself and then say, I'm crazy and do crazy stuff if you voluntarily induced a drug. And so that's why I don't think they have offered anything of a true insanity defense.

They're trying to do some type of public policy that if all of your friends jumped off of a bridge, would you jump off of a bridge? I literally think that that is the defense that they're going with, that since everybody thinks swinging is acceptable, Then Diddy thought it was acceptable, might even get into the fact Diddy's childhood thought that this was acceptable.