Sean Kent

I don't believe because you said the exact right thing, because what we always talk about is if somebody is truly insane and they commit a crime, I always say, if you're going to commit a crime and you want to prove you're crazy, get butt naked and put on a chicken suit and sit on the front yard and wait on the cops to come. But the way that he's acting this out is showing a sane state of mind.

So I really think this defense is going to justify Sean and not to exonerate Sean.

So I really think this defense is going to justify Sean and not to exonerate Sean.

So I really think this defense is going to justify Sean and not to exonerate Sean.

What's interesting about that is you remember, and that's why I think this is fascinating if it comes in, because remember... They have said they're not going to go into any 404B evidence, the prior bad acts against other situations.

What's interesting about that is you remember, and that's why I think this is fascinating if it comes in, because remember... They have said they're not going to go into any 404B evidence, the prior bad acts against other situations.

What's interesting about that is you remember, and that's why I think this is fascinating if it comes in, because remember... They have said they're not going to go into any 404B evidence, the prior bad acts against other situations.

They've got so much information just related to victim one and stuff about this case that it could be prior bad acts in and of itself and they don't have to get into it. And so if they're trying to call it something different, like the coercive control, because this whole thing is about coercion. Did he coerce her into doing something?

They've got so much information just related to victim one and stuff about this case that it could be prior bad acts in and of itself and they don't have to get into it. And so if they're trying to call it something different, like the coercive control, because this whole thing is about coercion. Did he coerce her into doing something?

They've got so much information just related to victim one and stuff about this case that it could be prior bad acts in and of itself and they don't have to get into it. And so if they're trying to call it something different, like the coercive control, because this whole thing is about coercion. Did he coerce her into doing something?

And so the government must prove that she was coerced, that this was not voluntary.

And so the government must prove that she was coerced, that this was not voluntary.

And so the government must prove that she was coerced, that this was not voluntary.

That is such a dumb damn question because you're putting such a thought inside of the jury's head. What is someone going to answer to that question? No, I think rich people go to the same rules. That is such a dumb question because the problem is you might get the answer. And then what ends up happening?

That is such a dumb damn question because you're putting such a thought inside of the jury's head. What is someone going to answer to that question? No, I think rich people go to the same rules. That is such a dumb question because the problem is you might get the answer. And then what ends up happening?

That is such a dumb damn question because you're putting such a thought inside of the jury's head. What is someone going to answer to that question? No, I think rich people go to the same rules. That is such a dumb question because the problem is you might get the answer. And then what ends up happening?

And you're actually already starting it for them. You're specifically saying Diddy is wealthy. You know, you're sending the questions like, hey, do you think this wealthy guy gets away with everything? Because you're already putting wealth into the jury's mind. And I don't know if that's actually necessary. I'm not a fan of that question.

And you're actually already starting it for them. You're specifically saying Diddy is wealthy. You know, you're sending the questions like, hey, do you think this wealthy guy gets away with everything? Because you're already putting wealth into the jury's mind. And I don't know if that's actually necessary. I'm not a fan of that question.

And you're actually already starting it for them. You're specifically saying Diddy is wealthy. You know, you're sending the questions like, hey, do you think this wealthy guy gets away with everything? Because you're already putting wealth into the jury's mind. And I don't know if that's actually necessary. I'm not a fan of that question.

You are. But that that actually is a great quote, because that is true. Like in almost every trial, a lot of times when there's co-defendants, the co-defendants not there. And so in unique trials, what usually ends up happening, like let's say it's a drug trial and two people are accused of selling drugs and the other person's not there.