Sean Kent

They've got so much information just related to victim one and stuff about this case that it could be prior bad acts in and of itself and they don't have to get into it. And so if they're trying to call it something different, like the coercive control, because this whole thing is about coercion. Did he coerce her into doing something?

They've got so much information just related to victim one and stuff about this case that it could be prior bad acts in and of itself and they don't have to get into it. And so if they're trying to call it something different, like the coercive control, because this whole thing is about coercion. Did he coerce her into doing something?

They've got so much information just related to victim one and stuff about this case that it could be prior bad acts in and of itself and they don't have to get into it. And so if they're trying to call it something different, like the coercive control, because this whole thing is about coercion. Did he coerce her into doing something?

And so the government must prove that she was coerced, that this was not voluntary.

And so the government must prove that she was coerced, that this was not voluntary.

And so the government must prove that she was coerced, that this was not voluntary.

That is such a dumb damn question because you're putting such a thought inside of the jury's head. What is someone going to answer to that question? No, I think rich people go to the same rules. That is such a dumb question because the problem is you might get the answer. And then what ends up happening?

That is such a dumb damn question because you're putting such a thought inside of the jury's head. What is someone going to answer to that question? No, I think rich people go to the same rules. That is such a dumb question because the problem is you might get the answer. And then what ends up happening?

That is such a dumb damn question because you're putting such a thought inside of the jury's head. What is someone going to answer to that question? No, I think rich people go to the same rules. That is such a dumb question because the problem is you might get the answer. And then what ends up happening?

And you're actually already starting it for them. You're specifically saying Diddy is wealthy. You know, you're sending the questions like, hey, do you think this wealthy guy gets away with everything? Because you're already putting wealth into the jury's mind. And I don't know if that's actually necessary. I'm not a fan of that question.

And you're actually already starting it for them. You're specifically saying Diddy is wealthy. You know, you're sending the questions like, hey, do you think this wealthy guy gets away with everything? Because you're already putting wealth into the jury's mind. And I don't know if that's actually necessary. I'm not a fan of that question.

And you're actually already starting it for them. You're specifically saying Diddy is wealthy. You know, you're sending the questions like, hey, do you think this wealthy guy gets away with everything? Because you're already putting wealth into the jury's mind. And I don't know if that's actually necessary. I'm not a fan of that question.

You are. But that that actually is a great quote, because that is true. Like in almost every trial, a lot of times when there's co-defendants, the co-defendants not there. And so in unique trials, what usually ends up happening, like let's say it's a drug trial and two people are accused of selling drugs and the other person's not there.

You are. But that that actually is a great quote, because that is true. Like in almost every trial, a lot of times when there's co-defendants, the co-defendants not there. And so in unique trials, what usually ends up happening, like let's say it's a drug trial and two people are accused of selling drugs and the other person's not there.

You are. But that that actually is a great quote, because that is true. Like in almost every trial, a lot of times when there's co-defendants, the co-defendants not there. And so in unique trials, what usually ends up happening, like let's say it's a drug trial and two people are accused of selling drugs and the other person's not there.

A good defense attorney is going to point the what that person must be the person who did it. And the judge has to say, look, this is Sean Combs day in trial. I don't want y'all to sit here and say anything about anybody else. If there's a trial for the other people, that'll happen at another date and time, not today.

A good defense attorney is going to point the what that person must be the person who did it. And the judge has to say, look, this is Sean Combs day in trial. I don't want y'all to sit here and say anything about anybody else. If there's a trial for the other people, that'll happen at another date and time, not today.

A good defense attorney is going to point the what that person must be the person who did it. And the judge has to say, look, this is Sean Combs day in trial. I don't want y'all to sit here and say anything about anybody else. If there's a trial for the other people, that'll happen at another date and time, not today.

So that question happens all the time, especially when there's co-defendants or not co-defendants.

So that question happens all the time, especially when there's co-defendants or not co-defendants.