Sean Kent

The easy thing would have been, I'll take a paid vacation and go. That's wrong. I don't... I've worked too hard and lived my life... The Police Commission is meeting this week to decide next steps, so we'll keep you updated.

Correct. So that means the original lawsuit was filed on October 15th, 2024. And then on February 6th, 2025, asked the court permission to amend. And in their February 6th filing, they said, we have done more investigation and we need to add stuff to our complaint to make it more accurate.

Correct. So that means the original lawsuit was filed on October 15th, 2024. And then on February 6th, 2025, asked the court permission to amend. And in their February 6th filing, they said, we have done more investigation and we need to add stuff to our complaint to make it more accurate.

Correct. So that means the original lawsuit was filed on October 15th, 2024. And then on February 6th, 2025, asked the court permission to amend. And in their February 6th filing, they said, we have done more investigation and we need to add stuff to our complaint to make it more accurate.

It is, and trust me, I've looked at a lot of lawsuits. 87 pages is... insane. It just is. It's a very lengthy lawsuit. That's how they chose to file their lawsuit. But the language is oddly specific and you usually don't see that. And it's not necessary. It's just additional for sensationalism. What does it help prove or not prove? So, no, I'm not used to seeing stuff like that in the lawsuit.

It is, and trust me, I've looked at a lot of lawsuits. 87 pages is... insane. It just is. It's a very lengthy lawsuit. That's how they chose to file their lawsuit. But the language is oddly specific and you usually don't see that. And it's not necessary. It's just additional for sensationalism. What does it help prove or not prove? So, no, I'm not used to seeing stuff like that in the lawsuit.

It is, and trust me, I've looked at a lot of lawsuits. 87 pages is... insane. It just is. It's a very lengthy lawsuit. That's how they chose to file their lawsuit. But the language is oddly specific and you usually don't see that. And it's not necessary. It's just additional for sensationalism. What does it help prove or not prove? So, no, I'm not used to seeing stuff like that in the lawsuit.

Normally, like I would be guessing, but in this situation, I agree that they would have been blindsided. Then if you look at the online filings, our federal system requires everything to be filed specifically online. There's nowhere in the federal filings that show that either of these two individuals have been served or given a copy of the actual lawsuit or answered the actual lawsuit.

Normally, like I would be guessing, but in this situation, I agree that they would have been blindsided. Then if you look at the online filings, our federal system requires everything to be filed specifically online. There's nowhere in the federal filings that show that either of these two individuals have been served or given a copy of the actual lawsuit or answered the actual lawsuit.

Normally, like I would be guessing, but in this situation, I agree that they would have been blindsided. Then if you look at the online filings, our federal system requires everything to be filed specifically online. There's nowhere in the federal filings that show that either of these two individuals have been served or given a copy of the actual lawsuit or answered the actual lawsuit.

So I'm assuming they found out when everybody else found out, which is crazy if you think about it.

So I'm assuming they found out when everybody else found out, which is crazy if you think about it.

So I'm assuming they found out when everybody else found out, which is crazy if you think about it.

What's interesting about that is, like I said, when I was doing my research and looking at it, like the, I want to make sure I say their names right, the contra, whatever, that police department specifically said, we looked into it and there was no merit to this situation. So this goes into a different type of level of potential coverup. That's wild.

What's interesting about that is, like I said, when I was doing my research and looking at it, like the, I want to make sure I say their names right, the contra, whatever, that police department specifically said, we looked into it and there was no merit to this situation. So this goes into a different type of level of potential coverup. That's wild.

What's interesting about that is, like I said, when I was doing my research and looking at it, like the, I want to make sure I say their names right, the contra, whatever, that police department specifically said, we looked into it and there was no merit to this situation. So this goes into a different type of level of potential coverup. That's wild.

Just based upon these allegations, I'm not saying they're true or not true, but the Contra Police Department said we did get this allegation. We did look into it and we discounted it and said there was nothing there. Do you know how strong that is for a police department to come in and say that a rape did not happen when someone says it did?

Just based upon these allegations, I'm not saying they're true or not true, but the Contra Police Department said we did get this allegation. We did look into it and we discounted it and said there was nothing there. Do you know how strong that is for a police department to come in and say that a rape did not happen when someone says it did?

Just based upon these allegations, I'm not saying they're true or not true, but the Contra Police Department said we did get this allegation. We did look into it and we discounted it and said there was nothing there. Do you know how strong that is for a police department to come in and say that a rape did not happen when someone says it did?

So that's fascinating to me because usually police departments don't do that.