Sean Kent

Wait, you date P. Diddy?

Yeah. Hold the phone.

Yeah. Hold the phone.

Yeah. Hold the phone.

Well, forgive me. They put it on the television.

Well, forgive me. They put it on the television.

Well, forgive me. They put it on the television.

Yeah, Puff, Sean. Yeah.

Yeah, Puff, Sean. Yeah.

Yeah, Puff, Sean. Yeah.

Completely. The details. So it's not corroboration in full fact. It's corroboration in full conduct. So it's basically saying this is something that this person is likely to do. So it corroborates the conduct of this person.

Completely. The details. So it's not corroboration in full fact. It's corroboration in full conduct. So it's basically saying this is something that this person is likely to do. So it corroborates the conduct of this person.

Completely. The details. So it's not corroboration in full fact. It's corroboration in full conduct. So it's basically saying this is something that this person is likely to do. So it corroborates the conduct of this person.

It could, but this is the thing I think folks are missing. If you look at the lawsuit, even though Diddy is named in the lawsuit, you notice there's a bunch of organizations and other individuals and other companies that are listed. That's who the people are going after because... There's no such thing as insurance for Diddy's awful actions.

It could, but this is the thing I think folks are missing. If you look at the lawsuit, even though Diddy is named in the lawsuit, you notice there's a bunch of organizations and other individuals and other companies that are listed. That's who the people are going after because... There's no such thing as insurance for Diddy's awful actions.

It could, but this is the thing I think folks are missing. If you look at the lawsuit, even though Diddy is named in the lawsuit, you notice there's a bunch of organizations and other individuals and other companies that are listed. That's who the people are going after because... There's no such thing as insurance for Diddy's awful actions.

So Sue and Diddy, candidly, is not going to do you a lot of good. He's not going to be able to participate in the lawsuit. He can't do anything until his criminal matter is over. But the lawsuits, all of them have a very interesting point. They're saying all of these corporations knew what Diddy was like.

So Sue and Diddy, candidly, is not going to do you a lot of good. He's not going to be able to participate in the lawsuit. He can't do anything until his criminal matter is over. But the lawsuits, all of them have a very interesting point. They're saying all of these corporations knew what Diddy was like.

So Sue and Diddy, candidly, is not going to do you a lot of good. He's not going to be able to participate in the lawsuit. He can't do anything until his criminal matter is over. But the lawsuits, all of them have a very interesting point. They're saying all of these corporations knew what Diddy was like.

They allowed him to engage in this behavior, and they could have stopped it, and they chose not to. The example I give is sort of like, If you have a dog and he bites one person, you're not on the hook for it because you didn't know your dog was likely to bite. But if your dog goes out and bites a second person and a third person and a fourth person, you're on notice.